Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-02-2017, 10:18 AM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,742,156 times
Reputation: 1721

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
It's not minuscule.
Dollar wise, in comparison to the overall budget, it is a tiny amount. The dollar figure won't be the issue for opposition. The dollar figure will be the point of supporters. It will be more talking past instead of talking to.

I'm not for it either way. As stated, they should vote it down in a bipartisan effort. It will be one less distraction.

 
Old 01-02-2017, 10:39 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,241,574 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stymie13 View Post
Dollar wise, in comparison to the overall budget, it is a tiny amount.
No it is not. One program. $3 billion dollars.

McConnell-Reid Deal Includes $3 Billion Earmark for Kentucky Project | 89.3 WFPL News Louisville

That is only one.

Quote:
The dollar figure won't be the issue for opposition. The dollar figure will be the point of supporters. It will be more talking past instead of talking to.

I'm not for it either way. As stated, they should vote it down in a bipartisan effort. It will be one less distraction.
THen stop making excuses.
 
Old 01-02-2017, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,882,153 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
We are $20 trillion in debt. It's not simply returning the money.
How is it not returning money? Is the earmark money used less efficiently than when the Feds spend it? I'd like to see proof.
Would you rather have the states in control of that money or have the Feds in control?

It doesn't raise the budget one bit.

Less than 1 percent of the budget

According to a 2010 ABC News article, earmark spending came to approximately $16.5 billion --0.2 percent of federal spending for fiscal 2010.
http://thefinancebase.com/earmarks-p...dget-1815.html

As an overall percentage of spending from recent Federal budgets, earmarks typically represented approximately 1-2 percent of the discretionary budget and less than 1 percent of the overall budget.

http://conginst.org/2016/09/15/the-c...ally-that-bad/
 
Old 01-02-2017, 10:49 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,241,574 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
How is it not returning money? Is the earmark money used less efficiently than when the Feds spend it? I'd like to see proof.
Would you rather have the states in control of that money or have the Feds in control?
It isn't being sent. We are $20 trillion in debt. I'll bet you argue for a balanced budget also.
 
Old 01-02-2017, 10:54 AM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,742,156 times
Reputation: 1721
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
No it is not. One program. $3 billion dollars.

McConnell-Reid Deal Includes $3 Billion Earmark for Kentucky Project | 89.3 WFPL News Louisville

That is only one.



THen stop making excuses.
No ones making excuses. It's called context: the total earmarked outlay is 40 billion +-. That's less than 1% of the budget.

And indicating I hope it is voted down, in 2 separate posts (now 3) is clear. This is different vs just complaining about it.
 
Old 01-02-2017, 10:58 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,241,574 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stymie13 View Post
No ones making excuses. It's called context: the total earmarked outlay is 40 billion +-. That's less than 1% of the budget.

And indicating I hope it is voted down, in 2 separate posts (now 3) is clear. This is different vs just complaining about it.
Your are making excuses. If it's wrong, it's wrong. Period.
 
Old 01-02-2017, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,882,153 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
It isn't being sent.
Isn't being sent? Sent where? Sent to whom? What does that even mean?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
We are $20 trillion in debt.
Do you have a point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I'll bet you argue for a balanced budget also.
You're all over the place. Keep trying.
 
Old 01-02-2017, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,882,153 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Your are making excuses. If it's wrong, it's wrong. Period.
Getting we the peoples money back into the hands of our localized entity, where we have a say so, is worse than letting the Feds have it?
 
Old 01-02-2017, 11:01 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,241,574 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post

You're all over the place. Keep trying.
So that would be a yes.
 
Old 01-02-2017, 11:02 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,241,574 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Getting we the peoples money back into the hands of our localized entity, where we have a say so, is worse than letting the Feds have it?
Argue to cut taxes. Can we also cut the military to balance the budget?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top