Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This "removed from the WH website" stuff was proven to have been done by Obama's staff as he left office. Each administration wants their own website. The old WH site was Obama's. Trump will have his own as well.
This "removed from the WH website" stuff was proven to have been done by Obama's staff as he left office. Each administrations wants their own website. The old WH site was Obama's. Trump will have his own as well.
Really? Link? Because I don't believe that the entire judiciary link has ever been removed--tweaked, yes, but not removed.
This "removed from the WH website" stuff was proven to have been done by Obama's staff as he left office. Each administration wants their own website. The old WH site was Obama's. Trump will have his own as well.
I'm sure it's all a coincidence
In the meantime I'm considering joining the ACLU at this rate.
Really? Link? Because I don't believe that the entire judiciary link has ever been removed--tweaked, yes, but not removed.
I guess you and OP missed all the controversy about this right here on CD just after the inauguration?
Strangely (or not since we know how the media is), this is the only article I could easily find at the moment despite the fact that multiple were shared in the threads about it right after it first broke on CD. https://gcn.com/articles/2017/01/27/...links.aspx?m=1
I guess you and OP missed all the controversy about this right here on CD just after the inauguration?
Strangely (or not since we know how the media is), this is the only article I could easily find at the moment despite the fact that multiple were shared in the threads about it right after it first broke on CD. https://gcn.com/articles/2017/01/27/...links.aspx?m=1
That article discusses the removal of the previous administration's platform and issues, not information on the judicial branch.
ok, wackos, what do you think this means? Just b/c some old pages are archived doesn't mean Trump removed the judiciary from the government!
More than likely trump's team didn't like the page or the words used. After all, Obama believed the judiciary got in the way of his style of leadership.
I'd see this as a hint that Trump's next SCOTUS nomination is coming soon and the page is going to reflect the views of whomever he's going to nominate.
Just like Donald Trump to make the "alternative facts" fit his reality. Because they struck down part of his immigration ban, he doesn't want the judiciary branch to exist anymore, so with a few easy clicks, they don't anymore
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
