Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
NOT so much today as can be seen by their loosing 1,000 political seats since 2009.
haha so clever. I think the KKK being made up of democrats decades ago is still a good comeback. hehehe
Notice that there are constantly people pointing out that Nixon, the most infamous of cheaters, was a republican every time your crowd brings up Hillary's various scandalous activities. Not saying you're immature... because it's obvious that you are and I don't need to say it.
I thought the actual number is 79%. .15% is insanely low.
it's consistent with the other appeals courts.
the SCOTUS hears .15% of the 9th courts rulings. the SCOTUS is specifically looking for cases they believe need to be challenged. of those 61% are reversed ( 80% reverse or vacated ). all other 9th court decisions ( 99.85% ) are upheld.
Look at the tactics of what they call "organizing". Would you like those dishonest things done to you?
1. Who is "they?"
2. What is organizing?
3. What dishonest things have they done to you?
4. What does any of this have to do with the press?
If you can answer these questions than maybe you will be better understood. At this point, I don't think you understand what you are writing here. Good luck.
The NY Post is a right wing rag not much more legitimate than the National Enquirer. Not sure if you have a point here?
As I was reading your sentence, I thought you were going to say the New York Time's, not the Enquirer. That would have been more akin to a valid comparison.
The NYT's had a decent reputation based on it's long history, which it has been trading on for a long time.
However it has turned into a shell of it's former self, now run by ultra leftists who will occasionally go after liberal politicians, but make an art form of attacking conservatives.
This is not to even mention how they have not endorsed a Republican candidate for president in 60 years.
That is right, they endorsed the likes of McGovern, Mondale, Dukakis, etc., many of whom were the biggest election losers in history.
No bias there, just coincidence, right?
Another pointless thread where a right winger attempts to conflate various bits of nonsense and arrive at a silly conclusion.
Op may as well have just stated the truth....." the right wing lies and promotes fake news ,and we desperately wish to pretend the left does it too.."
It is all they have...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
