Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The biased media keeps on attacking. Let's say Trump falters. Warren wins the DNC primaries and she beats Trump.
Now we have Pocahontas, basically Obama on steroids mixed with Bill deBlasio inexperience.
I wonder if this is what the left is going through (they see Trump akin to Warren).
Jesus, the terror.
1) She will probably be too old to run. Anyway, Hillary had it easy this time with only Bernie running. In the next primaries that would not be the case. There will probably be around 10 or more candidates competing.
2) Trump will not be the nominee next time. He will soon be kicked out. The 2020 GOP front runner is unknown at this time
[quote=oberon_1;47264034]1) She will probably be too old to run. Anyway, Hillary had it easy this time with only Bernie running. In the next primaries that would not be the case. There will probably be around 10 or more candidates competing.
2) Trump will not be the nominee next time. He will soon be kicked out. The 2020 GOP front runner is unknown at this time[/QUOTE]
just like how they would take the nomination from him at the convention, how they would replace him as the nominee when the Access Hollywood tape came out, and that electors would take the presidency away from him
What a horrible thing that must be for a knee-jerk conservative to contemplate. Someone as president, who places humanitarian values and the welfare of all our people, as a first priority.
What a horrible thing that must be for a knee-jerk conservative to contemplate. Someone as president, who places humanitarian values and the welfare of all our people, as a first priority.
So, even if anything in my post really expressed some sort of visceral hatred of Trump (it didn't; the point was that political discourse has died due to an anti-intellectual and self centered population... a point you only further prove by continuing to refuse to engage in), that would have nothing to do with my ability to understand a criticism of Elizabeth Warren.
I do want to point out here, WaldoKitty, a poster I will openly admit I'm not the biggest fan of based how he posts, responded to my original post, as did you, and asked a question about an alternatives the Democrats would run. While I thought he missed the mark a bit, he did in fairness point some interesting things out. We had a civil discussion all the same. He and I disagree on a lot; I get the sense he's not a fan of me and as I said, I find his posts to usually be rather repugnant, yet we engaged in politics with each other. So stop with this "you just don't understand" crap. YOU refuse to do it becasue you CAN'T explain your reasoning. Get the **** off your high horse. If I can civilly respond to a poster who makes threads all the time with nearly meaningless content staring with "WoW!" then you can explain why you think Elizabeth Warren would be "terror."
Sorry WaldoKitty. You and I have had our disagreements and I do want to take the time to say I genuinely enjoy sparring with you when you really spar back. Apologies for dragging you into this **** show
And, for what it's worth, my accusation of how post applies to far more than just you. Just to be clear, that I'm not singling you out for anything in particular.
You mad bro?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
