Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That "last minute rule change" regarding intelligence sharing (like in Dec or Jan...very recent) rarely gets discussed. "Why? & What was the motive" are good questions. The dude had less than a month or so left in office. Has anyone asked Obama or his staff this? (if not, why not?)
I don't get this...there had to be reason for this huge last minute rule change?
MSM gave lot of coverage to that story and hyped up Obama work in preserving the intelligence agency information. No one bothered to question why it is not done at the beginning of his presidency to preserve the information gathered during his full term.
Exactly. Or does he have something to hide? After all, during the debates his reply was "That makes
me smart."
For most Americans who pay income tax, it is the 1% who who "eat their cake and then have/get
a bigger cake." https://audioboom.com/posts/5110698-...really-matters
That "last minute rule change" regarding intelligence sharing (like in Dec or Jan...very recent) rarely gets discussed. "Why? & What was the motive" are good questions. The dude had less than a month or so left in office. Has anyone asked Obama or his staff this? (if not, why not?)
I don't get this...there had to be reason for this huge last minute rule change?
The rule change was done at the "eleventh hour." Like Thursday, January 12th! As Mark Levin has noted over and over, if this rule change was so important, why didn't he do it in 2009? Why wait until just days before he left office?
MSM gave lot of coverage to that story and hyped up Obama work in preserving the intelligence agency information. No one bothered to question why it is not done at the beginning of his presidency to preserve the information gathered during his full term.
Too much information being shared with too many people. This is troublesome, and likely why so much information is now being leaked. Highly suspicious.
Too much information being shared with too many people. This is troublesome, and likely why so much information is now being leaked. Highly suspicious.
They did this at the very end instead of beginning of the term. That is going to raise some flags and people are not going to buy MSM narrative of great thing to preserve intelligence information. It is clearly done to put a pressure on new coming administration. According to some AR Senator, leaks are happened from DOJ. Now rest of the MSM is kinda scrambling for new narrative, now Fox is running with stories about this wire tapping. But so far there is no word from FBI or DOJ.
so popping back in wondering if the left has accepted the New York Times Jan 20 2017 word that Trump Tower was in fact wire tapped?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
