Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-08-2017, 01:45 PM
 
2,248 posts, read 2,349,710 times
Reputation: 4234

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by theluckygal View Post
Yes, please lets focus on domestic issues. It is still better than paying for illegal immigrants & refugees. I dont mind using tax money for programs like planned parenthood but please lets stop foreign aid & wasting money on illegals' welfare programs. Whether we should support abortion or not are the real issues our leaders should be debating. Lets not be penny wise & pound foolish. When you are giving away billions in foreign aid & foreign wars, then debating about a few million dollars going towards planned parenthood is useless. Fix the unnecessary, big expenses first & start investing in domestic issues.

Some people have babies to get easy welfare money & some have abortions so that they dont have to go on welfare. So it is tough for me to pick a side. Depends on the person so I get the personal responsibility part.
Best post in his thread you hit the nail on the head! We spend how much on unnecessary wars on "terrorism" (oil) and how much locking people up over Marijuana and other petty offenses via the privatized prison complex?

It makes me chuckle when people are so adamant against funding programs that benefit others, but are silent like a mouse about obvious waste and corruption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-08-2017, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Asia
2,768 posts, read 1,583,987 times
Reputation: 3049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salmonburgher View Post
What percentage of abortions are performed to end pregnancies resultant from cases of rape?
Anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2017, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,704 posts, read 21,063,743 times
Reputation: 14254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salmonburgher View Post
What percentage of abortions are performed to end pregnancies resultant from cases of rape?
Why not ask how many rapes occur every year?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2017, 06:10 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,704 posts, read 21,063,743 times
Reputation: 14254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salmonburgher View Post
Anyone?
You will never know that answer. That is private info... So NYOB
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2017, 07:24 PM
Status: "Moldy Tater Gangrene, even before Moscow Marge." (set 3 days ago)
 
Location: Dallas, TX
5,790 posts, read 3,600,682 times
Reputation: 5697
Why don't men start taking personal responsibility for their own damned sex drive, namely by mastering it to the point where they never have sex before marriage, or at least before financial responsibility?

At any rate, the "personal responsibility" rhetoric is ultimately hyper-Libertarian propaganda masquerading as self-respect, with a heavy dose of shaming language to boot. If government shouldn't offer free birth control, then the government should not be in the business of paying for any kind of roads. A toll booth of 50 cents every time you turn onto another road (in this case, by circumstance, ALL are privately owned, and hence potentially toll roads). Abolish public schools and return to 1840 or thereabouts (or if you prefer, many modern African nations).

Also, on the broader subject of general personal responsibility, why not make ourselves responsible for repairing our own equipment (all kinds of electronics, plumbing, build your own house, and such)? Living your lives providing for your own needs WITHOUT any outside help? That may have passed muster during the 19th Century frontier farming days, with large tracts of fertile land with under 2 people per square mile. But today, that won't work - it's a "cultural fossil" from our formative years. If we tried that today, we'd end up like Afghanistan or Iraq or Somaila. Sorry, for industrial societies today (and even more so digital age ones), we depend on government and others to supply us with a realistically humane standard of living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2017, 07:41 PM
 
Location: Land of Thought and Flow
8,323 posts, read 15,171,483 times
Reputation: 4957
Quote:
Originally Posted by skepticratic View Post
Officially, federal funding cannot be used to fund abortions.

Wages have been stagnant. People are working longer hours and getting less for it, all the while, inflation carries on. Abstinence is an unrealistic expectation. It's a natural impulse to want to have sex and there are large health benefits to doing so.

For what it's worth, I think birth control should be cheaper, sex education improved, and wages need to rise. I'm less concerned about abortions and in general would recommend people avoid getting them, though recognize at times that it may be a responsible option.
Pretty much this.

With the added part that birth control costs aren't just in the medication, but in the doctor visit(s) required to find the right medication that regulates a specific woman's enough to be effective with as few side effects as possible. And ensuring that the medication is still an effective option as a woman's hormones and body changes.

When I was younger and getting my first prescription birth control, it took 4 tries to find a medication that didn't cause a bad side side effect.

Edit to Add: I'm all for personal responsibility. When it comes to preventing pregnancy, I also think that there is a societal responsibility factor to ensure that all people have access to proper sexual education and access to affordable medical care services (doctors, medication, etc). If the education is given and services are both affordable and accessible, then the need for abortion will naturally diminish. It may never be completely gone, as birth control failure is a thing.

And when it comes to taxpayer-funded abortion, it should really only be a thing for pregnancies as a result of rape or an abortion done for medical necessity.

Last edited by gallowsCalibrator; 03-08-2017 at 07:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2017, 05:23 AM
 
59,088 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak80 View Post
If poor people can't afford to use Planned Parenthood, it means that poor people will create unwanted children at an even faster rate than they are now. That means more crime, more police, more prisons, more welfare, and higher taxes to pay for all of that.
Like I said get all those rich entertainers we hear so much about always going on TV and stage and complain so much to fund PP.

OR, how about we tie the tubes of any of those "poor" women after they have their FIRST child that they CAN'T take of themselves.

"Stop the PROBLEM BEFORE IT HAPPENS NOT AFTER."

Like many have said, "It is NOT our responsibility to fund other people's "pleasures."

We KNOW we CANNOT "teach" them to be sexually responsible, we CANNOT teach them to use protection, we CANNOT teach them abstinence.

Many of us believe abortion for sexual pleasure is wrong so, why NOT stop the problem in the bud to MAKE SURE THEY DO NOT GET PREGNANT AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2017, 05:28 AM
 
12,905 posts, read 15,662,473 times
Reputation: 9394
I think it's been stated time and time again that Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars to perform abortions. Do some Planned Parenthood clinics perform abortions? Yes. Have their "books" been audited about where federal dollars go within the organization? Yes.

Women decry it's defunding because at one time or another many women have used it the absence of lack of funds for basic medical care or lack of access to a private clinic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2017, 05:35 AM
 
59,088 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by NextStage View Post
You realize that Planned Parenthood provides services far beyond abortion, right?



Planned Parenthood’s Services
Does EVERY other 501(c)(3) organizations in the country get federal funds?


Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. (PPFA), or Planned Parenthood, is a nonprofit organization that provides reproductive health services both in the United States and globally. It is a tax-exempt corporation under Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3),[4] and a member association of the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood

"Organizations described in section 501(c)(3) are commonly referred to as charitable organizations."

https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-pr...-organizations

It is a CHARITY and should be supported through DONATIONS.

If all those that are FOR abortion GAVE THEIR OWN MONEY, PP would NOT need fed money.

But, as usual the libs ALWAYS want OTHERS to pay for things and are NOT going to give their OWN money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2017, 05:39 AM
 
8,312 posts, read 3,929,182 times
Reputation: 10651
Quote:
Originally Posted by AminWi View Post
Your tax dollars do not pay for abortions. They help ensure that women are able to take responsibility, just as you are asking them to do. They pay for preventative care and access to birth control and other services that have nothing to do with obstetrics.

When I was a young married woman without health insurance, I used the local planned parenthood for my yearly checkups (at a reduced fee that I could afford out-of-pocket while my husband and I were getting our feet on the ground) and birth control at a reduced fee (I payed about the same amount out-of-pocket that I would have had we had health insurance). Planned parenthood helped ensure that we didn't end up with a baby before we could afford one, and I'll forever be grateful to them for that and the excellent care I received there as a patient.
They don't want to hear this of course. Planned Parenthood is just another convenient target, it makes them feel good to destroy it regardless of whether it has positive aspects. Trump himself said: "I would defund it, because I'm pro-life. But millions of women are helped by Planned Parenthood." So essentially the decision is to jump to destroy something rather than looking for alternative solutions. Why? Because it plays well to the base. He cares a lot more about that than he does the millions of women who are helped by Planned Parenthood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top