Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:25 AM
 
Location: FL
20,696 posts, read 12,593,356 times
Reputation: 5452

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
So, the federal government can violate an individuals 4th Amendment at will?

Oh, come on. You know way better than that. Why play stupid here, on this issue with us?
Alternative facts again?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:36 AM
 
Location: FL
20,696 posts, read 12,593,356 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
So the question is, did they have a FISA warrant.

I very much doubt that they did.

And leaking unmasked names to the media is not "following procedures".

It's a felony, committed by Obama's intelligence lackeys (no doubt at his direction).

This sort of corruption dovetails neatly with other corruption we saw from Obama -- like Loretta Lynch meeting with Bill Clinton on the airplane, immediately followed by James Comey mischaracterizing a statute by saying that it requires intent when it doesn't and letting Hillary off the hook.

Politicizing intel agencies and using them against your political opponents is what police states do.

I wonder if our first gay president has a pair of knee-high black leather boots in his closet.
Who leaked unmasked names? Please supply the link.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:40 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,464,064 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donna-501 View Post
Who leaked unmasked names? Please supply the link.
We don't know yet.

We only know that they were leaked.

That's how the press got them.

I don't suppose you're going to ask me to provide a link when I say that 2 + 2 = 4....?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:42 AM
 
16,212 posts, read 10,879,932 times
Reputation: 8443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Well if it came from Infowars who am I to doubt the credibility of that report.
This.

Infowars is a propaganda site.

It is sad that so many of you believe the things they "report."

FWIW its interesting how the right is trying to steer their followers away from focusing on the actual investigation and what is being discovered about the Trump campaign and its confirmed connections to Russian spies in order to talk about "unmasking" names.

People are way to guillible. First Obama wiretapped him now you are talking about names. All the while Flynn wants immunity. As Trump has stated himself - you don't need immunity if you haven't done anything wrong...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:51 AM
 
45,880 posts, read 27,530,872 times
Reputation: 24186
Quote:
Originally Posted by jertheber View Post
Much ado about nothing---but--that's the entirety of the Trump strategy, make claims and force the opposition into a defensive posture. This tactic isn't simply a Trump tool however, both parties are engaged in it at every turn of the political screws. Meanwhile, back at the ranch (white house) nothing of any importance is being done. Ahh, America what happened to ya??
Actually, that's been the strategy of the people claiming Trump/Russia collusion. There's no evidence after months of investigation. Even with the access to all of the information that they had - nothing has been found, yet they hammer on continuously.

Unlike the Trump/Russia collusion - someone absolutely broke the law with regards to leaking classified information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:54 AM
 
5,236 posts, read 4,707,422 times
Reputation: 17368
Quote:
Originally Posted by residinghere2007 View Post
This.

Infowars is a propaganda site.

It is sad that so many of you believe the things they "report."

FWIW its interesting how the right is trying to steer their followers away from focusing on the actual investigation and what is being discovered about the Trump campaign and its confirmed connections to Russian spies in order to talk about "unmasking" names.

People are way to guillible. First Obama wiretapped him now you are talking about names. All the while Flynn wants immunity. As Trump has stated himself - you don't need immunity if you haven't done anything wrong...
The administration came in on a wave of misinformation, now it must keep the fires burning in order that the faithful will have something to chew on. All politicians are capable of every kind of skulduggery, it's a dirty game and the citizens are now in cahoots with the entire slug fest of party politics. Meanwhile...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:54 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,862 posts, read 46,821,204 times
Reputation: 18523
Quote:
Originally Posted by residinghere2007 View Post
This.

Infowars is a propaganda site.

It is sad that so many of you believe the things they "report."

FWIW its interesting how the right is trying to steer their followers away from focusing on the actual investigation and what is being discovered about the Trump campaign and its confirmed connections to Russian spies in order to talk about "unmasking" names.

People are way to guillible. First Obama wiretapped him now you are talking about names. All the while Flynn wants immunity. As Trump has stated himself - you don't need immunity if you haven't done anything wrong...

Bloomberg must have believed it. They were forced to pick it up(been sitting on it for 2 days) and run it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:56 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,994,173 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Guess you are debating here while being uninformed.
I'm guessing you have not seen this little exercise in contradicting ones self over and over.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpjN4iEz9Oo
I'd like some real evidence, please. Not your biased interpretation of a Susan Rice interview.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:58 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,994,173 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
The logs prove that and there has been no disputing it. She admitted to it yesterday.
Link to the logs. Because you are putting a lot of stock into these logs, especially considering you don't seem to know what they contain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,823 posts, read 26,552,371 times
Reputation: 34091
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
No, she indicated that she DID request the unmasking.
We know the following:
Trump associates were surveilled.
Their names were unmasked and leaked to the media.
Susan Rice requested the unmasking.
At the same time, Obama ordered the NSA to share its raw intel data with 16 other intel agencies, making leaks much more likely.
Now we need to find out who besides Susan Rice (if there is such a person) did the leaking.
No admission of leaking needed.
She requested that the names be unmasked.
Then she or someone who had access to her information (including the NSA which did the actual unmasking) leaked those names.
Well you better get right on that Inspector Clouseau
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top