Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Those Cybersecurity "Experts" who said last year that Russia Hacked the Election have had to retract what they have said and now they are refusing to cooperate with Congress. No doubt they were expecting Hillary to win.
Also not reported, these "Experts" were hired by none other than Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
But now the first expert company to make a link between the DNC hacks and the Kremlin is facing a damaging series of questions over its credibility, DailyMail.com can disclose.
Cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has had to retract portions of a report supporting its allegations of Russian cyberattacks – and is also refusing to address Congress about its findings on Moscow's election hacking.
Status:
"Smartened up and walked away!"
(set 22 days ago)
11,769 posts, read 5,783,856 times
Reputation: 14188
Really - nothing to see when you close your eyes and still think that everything that the Dems feed you is true. Come on - think for yourself - you can still hate Trump but realize that you've been played.
The entire Russians Hacked Election was started by the DNC and Clinton campaign. Now that Clinton has lost, the company of "experts" who said it, can't prove it. No doubt they didn't expect to ever be asked.
I'll assign more credibility when the story isn't only on right-wing websites.
Hmm. The company who said it was hired by Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Debbie was forced to resign from the DNC for helping Hillary to cheat.
I'd think you might want to be a little more interested in it than that since you guys have been basing your entire "Russians cost Hillary the Election" mime on it.
The entire Russians Hacked Election was started by the DNC and Clinton campaign. Now that Clinton has lost, they company of "experts" who said it, can't prove it. No doubt they didn't expect to ever be asked.
Is this company hired by DNC? I don't know how FBI decided not to do their own data collection instead relied on information from this company. Are they going back on their earlier report? Did some one obtain copy of this information?
#1 CrowdStrike - that the Democrats hired insisted at the time that Russia not only hacked the US election, but also the Ukraine artillery - Ukraine says it is BS.
#2 Some of Crowdstrike's key evidence was an unsubstantiated blog - LOL!
#3 The DNC still has refused to let the FBI look at their server - just "CrowdStrike" that they hired - I wonder why?
#4 I remember Republicans asking Democrats if they could hire their own pet company to investigate and the point going right over the heads of the Hillary-bots. Derp!
#5 Several cybersecurity experts are now saying that the DNC's CrowdStrike has a pattern of bad methods and inaccurate statements. Derp!
#6 CrowdStrike had previously offered new conclusions in January with no new evidence that doesn't add up and the MSM jumped on board.
The DNC's hiring of CrowdStrike was a hit job period and the MSM was an accomplice.
I'll assign more credibility when the story isn't only on right-wing websites.
CrowdStrike's key piece of evidence was an unsubstantiated blog from an alleged Russian right winger - that was big enough to cause a poop storm here in the US - what gives with the double standard?!?!
Hey, I am going to go make a blog about Trump eating kittens for breakfast and puppies for lunch. That will be good enough for CrowdStrike, the DNC, MSM....and you to crap your pants over for months! At that point it will be on a blog on the internet - it must be true - right!?!?!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.