Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What a goon. The issue needs to be framed as women's health broadly not narrowly a divisive issue like abortion.
No. People should know exactly what the Democrat Party is about, without the soft language. The Democrat Party wants more abortions. That is a fact. It has nothing to do with "women's health."
80% of Americans are pro choice, so 80% of the country is crazy ????
Yep, most any Lefty considers me a Conservative, even though Im Pro-Choice (Pro-abortion actually), Pro-Womans Rights, Pro LBGQT and XYZ, and I'll stick with Roe V Wade forever like the majority of Americans.
At the end of the day, abortion was made legal by the SCOTUS. Were it to become illegal, it would be by the SCOTUS. So making this a litmus test is a stupid self inflicted wound. I will be sending an angry letter to Perez.
John Bel Edwards, Governor of Louisiana, is pro-life. Does that hurt me any as a New Yorker? It is better than a Republican having that seat.
We've got to frame 2018 on the economy and forget about these stupid social issues that only lose us elections.
The party itself does not have a litmus test for running, so my original point still stands. We have had the position for almost 5 decades now and have won presidencies , senates, and Houses. Your argument only works if you believe the people are changing or if the message is wrong.
And John Bel Edwards is not pro life, as he does not believe Roe vs Wade should be overturned.
Yep, most any Lefty considers me a Conservative, even though Im Pro-Choice (Pro-abortion actually), Pro-Womans Rights, Pro LBGQT and XYZ, and I'll stick with Roe V Wade forever like the majority of Americans.
Social issues are not what makes an individual liberal or conservative in the minds of many(especially those under 30).
And besides, you have a lot of post attacking liberalism and the Democratic Party. You may not consider yourself to be conservative, but I dont think you should pretend to be shocked that you get labeled one.
The party itself does not have a litmus test for running, so my original point still stands. We have had the position for almost 5 decades now and have won presidencies , senates, and Houses. Your argument only works if you believe the people are changing or if the message is wrong.
And John Bel Edwards is not pro life, as he does not believe Roe vs Wade should be overturned.
Have to wonder why the black population is decreasing in the USA, while Hispanic populations are booming.
Wasn't there more slaves(freemen) than white people after the Civil War, in the south?
What happened. They all didn't just up and move to northern states.
You had Margret Sanger, that's who. A very racist woman. Who planned on less black people being parents.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
