Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I connected the dots... and the picture that emerged was one of Obama appointed Lefty judges striking down reasonable executive orders not because they are in violation of the constitution but due to a biased opinion and the shear fact that the order came from Trumps desk.
Block it all to discredit him and darn the people of the USA.
I wonder if Madonna was ever investigated when at the pussyhat march she said before thousands of people that she was going to burn the White House down?
Robert Reich explains how an assault on the federal judiciary is an abuse of the president's constitutional authority:
One way dictators take over democracies is by threatening the independence of a nation’s courts. Donald Trump is doing just this.
Connect the following dots:
1. In January, Trump blasted a federal judge for staying his travel ban. “The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!” he tweeted.
2. In February, after the judge made the stay permanent, Trump issued a veiled threat: “Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. If something happens blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!”
Really? He threatened to shut down a court because they ruled against him?
False equivalency fallacy
He didn't threaten to shut down a court because it ruled against him. That is your interpretation, not fact. Their ruling was incorrect, and beyond their authority to make, because they didn't rule on the law (if they had, they would have had to rule in Trump's favor, because the law is unambiguously clear). What they did was usurp the President's authority to make immigration policy. That is beyond their authority. They have not been granted any power on immigration policy matters. The Courts only power is making rulings based on the law. The law says the President may do what Trump did, if he deems it necessary and prudent.
Obviously you never bothered to read the law and inform yourself.
Robert Reich explains how an assault on the federal judiciary is an abuse of the president's constitutional authority:
One way dictators take over democracies is by threatening the independence of a nation’s courts. Donald Trump is doing just this.
Connect the following dots:
1. In January, Trump blasted a federal judge for staying his travel ban. “The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!” he tweeted.
2. In February, after the judge made the stay permanent, Trump issued a veiled threat: “Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. If something happens blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!”
Well, Trump is stepping up to a plate while Obama spit his peas in the milk. They are all idiots. I think I will give it a go next round I'll start a Go Fund ME or Kickstarter soon so watch for it.
Being a moron isn't grounds for impeachment.
AND The judge made a ruling completely based in law. It's not biased automatically because it's against you.
No, he didn't. The law wasn't even cited. The law is clearly on the President's side. The judge made his ruling based on his hatred for Trump, and his personal political bias toward Muslims. The ruling was plainly wrong and politically motivated.
He didn't threaten to shut down a court because it ruled against him. That is your interpretation, not fact. Their ruling was incorrect, and beyond their authority to make, because they didn't rule on the law (if they had, they would have had to rule in Trump's favor, because the law is unambiguously clear). What they did was usurp the President's authority to make immigration policy. That is beyond their authority. They have not been granted any power on immigration policy matters. The Courts only power is making rulings based on the law. The law says the President may do what Trump did, if he deems it necessary and prudent.
Obviously you never bothered to read the law and inform yourself.
seems clear to me you are banking on nobody here understanding the process and are trying to pretend you are an authority on the subject.
NO judgment has been passed on anything but a stay. and the bar has been met, so tough.
the 9th did what any district can do, they saw harm and likelihood of success, and put a stay in place. THAT is the bar, not your nonsense. Ultimately Trump may even prevail, but the 9th is totally legit and the vast majority of its rulings do not get pushed up as you likely know.
Trump can have his day just like anyone else until that point you will to sit on your hands and wait, and who knows maybe SCOTUS will even accept the case and maybe Trump would win.... But we wont know until they rule.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Bam!
I'll start a Go Fund ME or Kickstarter soon so watch for it.
