Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There's considerable evidence that Trump received financing from Russian interests, despite Trump's denials (few Americans trust Trump apart from his Trumpie groupies).
So, which link discusses this evidence? I looked at the link above this paragraph and the one below. The one above is about the guy that lied to Pence and got canned immediately from Trump's Cabinet. If anything, that shows that Trump will not put up with people in his administration who lie and possibly collude with Russia.
Show us a link that supports what you say, otherwise you are FAKE POSTING!
So, which link discusses this evidence? I looked at the link above this paragraph and the one below. The one above is about the guy that lied to Pence and got canned immediately from Trump's Cabinet. If anything, that shows that Trump will not put up with people in his administration who lie and possibly collude with Russia.
Show us a link that supports what you say, otherwise you are FAKE POSTING!
There are plenty of reports of Russians backing Trump financially; the real issue is whether you would believe them or scream "fake news!"
Ryan, McConnell, Gowdy, Nuñes, ... are complicit in the POTUS's attempt to derail the investigation of a foreign adversary's involvement in our election and in Trump's administration.
Covering up political skulduggery is one thing.
Covering up treason is another.
Maybe those people you mention have just not been shown any evidence of wrongdoing at this point. So far, the investigation is proceeding on statements by people who were upset that they lost an election. It could be they know more than the general public about how this is a total waste of time and tax dollars to pursue. Only the Democrats, who have something to gain, are pursuing this.
In Watergate, a lot of Republicans saw that there was evidence and supported the investigation. Looking back over the last 40 some years, whenever a Republican was disgracing the party, many of the party members dealt with it respectfully and got rid of him. During the same period, whenever a Democrat was disgracing his or her own party, it seemed the whole party circled the wagons and supported them.
So, which link discusses this evidence? I looked at the link above this paragraph and the one below. The one above is about the guy that lied to Pence and got canned immediately from Trump's Cabinet. If anything, that shows that Trump will not put up with people in his administration who lie and possibly collude with Russia.
Show us a link that supports what you say, otherwise you are FAKE POSTING!
Now, having done business in the past with Russians does not prove that Mr. Trump colluded with said Russians last year. However, the man himself, and his son, claimed business ties.
Maybe those people you mention have just not been shown any evidence of wrongdoing at this point. So far, the investigation is proceeding on statements by people who were upset that they lost an election. It could be they know more than the general public about how this is a total waste of time and tax dollars to pursue. Only the Democrats, who have something to gain, are pursuing this.
In Watergate, a lot of Republicans saw that there was evidence and supported the investigation. Looking back over the last 40 some years, whenever a Republican was disgracing the party, many of the party members dealt with it respectfully and got rid of him. During the same period, whenever a Democrat was disgracing his or her own party, it seemed the whole party circled the wagons and supported them.
There is your difference in a nutshell.
No it is not okay to block congressional hearings/investigations because you refuse to recognize the evidence right in front of your eyes.
Looking back over the last fifty years, every time a Republican was disgracing the party, took a while to get things straightened out.
Just to keep things in perspective here regarding Republican administrations.
Over the past fifty some years -- 89 criminal convictions of Republicans versus 1 for the Democrats.
Republicans have been, by far, the most criminally corrupt party to hold the office of the presidency.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
