Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Here's a thought exercise for Trump denialists from "today's" Washington Post:
"Huma Abedin and Russia’s ambassador to Washington discussed the possibility of setting up a secret and secure communications channel between Hillary Clinton's transition team and the Kremlin, using Russian diplomatic facilities in an apparent move to shield their pre-inauguration discussions from monitoring, according to U.S. officials briefed on intelligence reports.
Ambassador Sergey Kislyak reported to his superiors in Moscow that Abedin, trusted aide to then-President-elect Clinton, made the proposal during a meeting on Dec. 1 or 2 at Clinton's headquarters, according to intercepts of Russian communications that were reviewed by U.S. officials."
LOL, read this and was about to post that if Clinton did it, then we need to lock her up too, because none of this is OK.
I even googled the quote looking for it. Didn't find it...of course.
]If so, show proof and prosecute if there was something illegal done.[/b] Until then I'm tired of all the he said she said accusations.
Getting to the stage where we nail his ass and his family to the wall is a process, not an event. Give it time. It will happen. The wheels of justice turn slowly but surely.
Here's a thought exercise for Trump denialists from "today's" Washington Post:
"Huma Abedin and Russia’s ambassador to Washington discussed the possibility of setting up a secret and secure communications channel between Hillary Clinton's transition team and the Kremlin, using Russian diplomatic facilities in an apparent move to shield their pre-inauguration discussions from monitoring, according to U.S. officials briefed on intelligence reports.
Ambassador Sergey Kislyak reported to his superiors in Moscow that Abedin, trusted aide to then-President-elect Clinton, made the proposal during a meeting on Dec. 1 or 2 at Clinton's headquarters, according to intercepts of Russian communications that were reviewed by U.S. officials."
Ohhh great. You just gave Faux News , Rush Limbaugh, Alex Jones , Kelly Anne Conway, Sean Spicer and every Republican on CD their talking points . They will cut and paste your post and use it as rebuttal for the next 6 months. Thanks elliment
Here's a thought exercise for Trump denialists from "today's" Washington Post:
"Huma Abedin and Russia’s ambassador to Washington discussed the possibility of setting up a secret and secure communications channel between Hillary Clinton's transition team and the Kremlin, using Russian diplomatic facilities in an apparent move to shield their pre-inauguration discussions from monitoring, according to U.S. officials briefed on intelligence reports.
Ambassador Sergey Kislyak reported to his superiors in Moscow that Abedin, trusted aide to then-President-elect Clinton, made the proposal during a meeting on Dec. 1 or 2 at Clinton's headquarters, according to intercepts of Russian communications that were reviewed by U.S. officials."
Well done! Except you left out the part that the trusted aide was $1 billion plus underwater on a real estate deal, the Chinese financing had just fallen through, and the Russians were willing to pony up but prohibited by sanctions.
If so, show proof and prosecute if there was something illegal done. Until then I'm tired of all the he said she said accusations.
Patience, dear. There is no one at this point refuting the accusations, any proof is (aka evidence) is in the hands of law enforcement, and the investigation is proceeding according to law. This is real life, not TV, and it takes a bit more than 60 minutes to wrap things up.
Well done! Except you left out the part that the trusted aide was $1 billion plus underwater on a real estate deal, the Chinese financing had just fallen through, and the Russians were willing to pony up but prohibited by sanctions.
Agreed. But he/she left out that Hillary then fired Comey when Comey wouldn't get on his knees.
Patience, dear. There is no one at this point refuting the accusations, any proof is (aka evidence) is in the hands of law enforcement, and the investigation is proceeding according to law. This is real life, not TV, and it takes a bit more than 60 minutes to wrap things up.
Louie doesn't care about proof. Trump Regime are his guys. He is loyal to the bitter end. He and his Ilk are 2017 Bahgdad Bob's......
This all seems so unAmerican. Why would there be a "back channel" line of communications with Russia that avoids our own security? Why? And why was the Russian ambassador so protective of their own communications but Kushner and Flynn seem so careless about ours? The Russians must be absolutely amazed that our own administration was trying to do this.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
