Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We know warming has occurred in the past, there are scientific explanations for most but not all.
Not scientific, if it were scientific, they could be established by verification, validation, and replication. What you are talking about is molded assumptions which is not science.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
So show us your theory that the warming in the last 100 years is natural, there must be a scientific reason.
Albert Einstein once said when asked what he thought about a collection of scientists who came together to object to his work.
He said "It doesn't take a 100 scientists to prove me wrong, it takes a single fact".
I don't need to "prove" some counter theory in order to show your position to be invalid. I need only point to a single fact that of any claim you make that can not be verified, validated and replicated according to scientific principal and your "claim" becomes invalid.
Not scientific, if it were scientific, they could be established by verification, validation, and replication. What you are talking about is molded assumptions which is not science.
Albert Einstein once said when asked what he thought about a collection of scientists who came together to object to his work.
He said "It doesn't take a 100 scientists to prove me wrong, it takes a single fact".
I don't need to "prove" some counter theory in order to show your position to be invalid. I need only point to a single fact that of any claim you make that can not be verified, validated and replicated according to scientific principal and your "claim" becomes invalid.
Welcome to science!
Funny that you mention that Einstein quote, as its mentioned in this rebuttal to you. You do actually have to have at least some kind of consistent counter theory if you want to go against the current theory. https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...P&sf84567786=1
Quote:
For AGW skeptics to overturn the consensus, they would need to find flaws with all the lines of supportive evidence and show a consistent convergence of evidence toward a different theory that explains the data. (Creationists have the same problem overturning evolutionary theory.) This they have not done.
Just finding minor flaws is not enough to overturn consensus in the scientific community, you need more than that but none of you sceptics have more than that.
He really hits it on the head. Can't control the border but can control the heavens. How arrogant.
I wonder if they actually believe we humans can make the climate stop its changing nature for billions of years? I think the climate alarmists are the following categories:
1) Those looking to make some money off of the alarmism...always follow who is going to get money.
2) Those hoping to take down developed countries - Jealousy
3) Idiots that believe what they're told - Useful Fools
Funny that you mention that Einstein quote, as its mentioned in this rebuttal to you. You do actually have to have at least some kind of consistent counter theory if you want to go against the current theory. https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...P&sf84567786=1
You are seriously going to quote some opinion pace to dismiss centuries of process to which is already established?
Where? Where is this evidence of such? Show me the history of this claim, where it exists in the scientific method? Please?
I mean for the love of sanity, your article has no sources, no citation, NOTHING... it is flipping GARBAGE!
Unbelievable the crap you people spew.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natsku
Just finding minor flaws is not enough to overturn consensus in the scientific community, you need more than that but none of you sceptics have more than that.
Scientific method.
Consensus is not science.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
