Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-09-2017, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,601,522 times
Reputation: 7801

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post
A grand jury witness said the bystanders begged the man to get off the guy. He was turning get purple. The cops' husband refused to get off. He and the wife were indicted for murder.

Very good. Let's hope the guy gets prison time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post
The witnesses said it took 43 minutes for the cops to get there. Wonder if the deputy's husband sat on him all that time?

I hope not. I read that once the jerkface and his wife noticed he wasn't breathing, then he decided to move his fat arse off of him and the wife performed cpr.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-09-2017, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Charleston, SC
7,103 posts, read 5,986,609 times
Reputation: 5712
They took the cellphones for evidence. They said the case is under investigation. Nothing else to see here, move along.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 12:50 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,206,841 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Come on DD, now they have the cop and the hubby up on murder charges.

It's called due process and waiting for the facts.

We even got a video of them doing it.

Was that really such a tough request?

I've seen these encounters go completely the other way too as facts have come out, especially when the family runs in front of the news camera and starts lying and the news article (like this one) is heavily anchored in their depiction of events.

People read those stories, pick a side and then stubbornly refuse to change their minds despite additional information.
I picked a side because I had enough information to do so.

I didn't even need the video to figure this one out.

If you did, then that's on you. I didn't. And I'm gonna steadfastly hold to my opinion. The original link I posted gave enough information to figure this one out.

And if it hadn't been for lots of media attention, the sheriffs dept was more than ready to cover it up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiseManOnceSaid View Post
They took the cellphones for evidence. They said the case is under investigation. Nothing else to see here, move along.
Like hell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 01:14 PM
 
3,106 posts, read 1,770,628 times
Reputation: 4558
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxus View Post
I only seen the short video, is this the only one?

He has him in a choke hold, which from the story occurred because the now deceased person attacked him because of a confrontation about urinating in public.

I seriously doubt there is any intent to kill the person, it looked more to me like a restraint than anything else. Issue is does the guy know about the potential issues with this type of restraint? Choking him and putting weight on his chest is suppose to be a brief restraint technique in order to transition to a better technique, not a minutes long ordeal, especially given the situation (it is not like he attacked with a weapon or tried to trigger a bomb).

I think a murder charge is a bit too much, after all, the guy did attack and this person took on self defense. I do not think there was any intent on killing him, but not sure what to charge him with because if the guy did not die, or even have an injury, would there be any charges at all? If I punch someone in self defense, I would not be charged, but should that change if the punch killed the person? Though that was not the intent?

For being a cop, she sure is ****-poor at it. She clearly should know restraint techniques and apply them, there is no excuse for her actions.
What you are missing is that the cop and her hubby were being given input that the guy was having a hard time breathing yet they continued at it until he actually stopped breathing and needed CPR. She as a cop should have understood the consequences of what her husband was doing. If they didn't intend for the guy to die, they shouldn't have choked him until he stopped breathing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 01:45 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,467,310 times
Reputation: 8599
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/06/0...l?_r=0&referer

"A Texas sheriff’s deputy and her husband were indicted Thursday on murder charges in the choking death of a man outside a restaurant last month.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Mayacama Mtns in CA
14,520 posts, read 8,768,824 times
Reputation: 11356
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/06/0...l?_r=0&referer

"A Texas sheriff’s deputy and her husband were indicted Thursday on murder charges in the choking death of a man outside a restaurant last month.
Thanks for posting this article. It helps to fill in the events which took place before chokehold. I hope it has been reported accurately.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 02:45 PM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,822,893 times
Reputation: 25191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biker53 View Post
What you are missing is that the cop and her hubby were being given input that the guy was having a hard time breathing yet they continued at it until he actually stopped breathing and needed CPR. She as a cop should have understood the consequences of what her husband was doing. If they didn't intend for the guy to die, they shouldn't have choked him until he stopped breathing.
After looking at more articles and such, I agree it was excessive, aside from the law, it broke the whole street code thing about fighting.

I am not familiar with Texas laws on the charges, because I am thinking murder may be a bit high of a bar to get a conviction on, versus a lesser charge. I do not think they intended to kill him, but I do believe they clearly went beyond the legal self defense, to illegal offense.

I am still wondering about the events before, how true they were. On a sided note; bothered by urinating? Really? Rule of conflict resolution is to avoid it in the first place. Urinating is hardly an issue to confront someone over (because the high likelihood of it escalating), versus calling the police and/or notifying the restaurant manager.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 02:59 PM
 
3,538 posts, read 1,328,371 times
Reputation: 1462
when trying to be superman goes wrong and you end up killing a guy for taking a **** instead of just minding your business. I have no sympathy for these people. I hope they both end up in prison for a long time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 03:21 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,892,870 times
Reputation: 11259
This incident showed how effed up society has become. Not only the perps, but the idiot video taping instead of interfering and the Denny's worker who stated she wanted to act but company policy prevented her. A whole lot of beyond stupid here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Mayacama Mtns in CA
14,520 posts, read 8,768,824 times
Reputation: 11356
Boxus wrote:
Quote:
I am not familiar with Texas laws on the charges, because I am thinking murder may be a bit high of a bar to get a conviction on, versus a lesser charge.
The way I understand it, because a Grand Jury brought back the charge of homicide, and that will seemingly be the indictment for both Thompsons, it is pretty much where they have to start.
It does allow room for plea-bargaining down to aggravated manslaughter or some such.

It will be interesting to follow this case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top