Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2017, 10:19 AM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,331,859 times
Reputation: 8066

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks View Post
Lower courts have ruled against the baker among other businesses, stating that businesses must comply with anti-discrimination laws.
Just my opinion, and I'm not a lawyer but I suspect the SCOTUS will uphold the rulings of the lower courts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2017, 10:19 AM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,005 posts, read 12,595,161 times
Reputation: 8925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike930 View Post
When it comes to objections on religious grounds I can understand a pastor refusing to marry them. But a business like caterer, photographer or baker, no.
Many pastors do not work with the public and wont even marry those not in their congregation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by irspow View Post
I suppose that "working with the public" means relinquishing your freedoms and being forced to "work for the public". Gotta' love the land of the free. I guess "private businesses" are ACTUALLY government businesses to be run as the government sees fit. Business "owners" are actually government employees. Gotta' love the land of the free.
Hyperbole and a gross exageration. Discrimination is not protected activity. Opening a store front to the public is working with the public. In public you get to deal with public rules.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 10:20 AM
 
2,003 posts, read 1,168,634 times
Reputation: 1949
I would never question a religious belief but I can also remember how Blacks were treated and this could easily become the same thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 10:21 AM
 
51,654 posts, read 25,828,130 times
Reputation: 37894
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
Businesses can legally refuse to do business with customers as long as they don't violate anti discrimination laws. This means they cannot kick you out because of your race, religion, disability and other reasons that are written in law.

They can refuse to service you because you're cussing at them, or because you aren't complying with their rules such as "no shirt, no shoes, no service" or various other reasons.
I bet this has been explained over a hundred times on this very forum.

If you do business in the U.S., you have to abide by certain laws, fire codes, health dept. regulations, labor laws, anti-discrimination laws...

If you prefer to do business in more of a Wild West atmosphere, you could open a business trucking supplies to NGOs in South Sudan. I understand the government there imposes few restrictions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 10:30 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by David A Stone View Post
How do bars get by with posting a sign..........."We have the right to refuse service to anyone "
Restaurants and bars impose arbitrary dress codes on patrons as a condition of service, as well, without even having to resort to their First Amendment Right to the exercise of the owner's religion for doing so.

Examples:

Restaurants that require men to wear a suit jacket and tie.

Bars that prohibit MC members from wearing their "cuts" or "colors" in the bar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 10:30 AM
 
Location: The ends DO NOT justify the means!!!
4,783 posts, read 3,742,907 times
Reputation: 1336
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottomobeale View Post
Hyperbole and a gross exageration. Discrimination is not protected activity. Opening a store front to the public is working with the public. In public you get to deal with public rules.
The government cannot and should not discriminate as it supposedly represents all people. A private business however is a private venture representing the interests of the owner. People can choose whom they do business with, but the government has guns and thugs, so the hapless subjects/citizens have no choice on their government. This is a key distinction between the two. Government is an institution of aggression, business is an institution of exchange.

Discrimination is not a "protected activity"? It is not a natural right to associate with those whom you wish and to avoid those whom you do not? So people should be forced to associate with others against their will? Must be nice to have your existence dictated by a government gun instead of your free will...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 10:32 AM
 
18,976 posts, read 7,024,835 times
Reputation: 3584
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottomobeale View Post
If you work with the public you work with them. Just like if a black couple had come in and he had refused.
Is the black couple trying to force them to participate in their gay wedding?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 10:32 AM
 
16,603 posts, read 8,615,472 times
Reputation: 19431
Quote:
Originally Posted by irspow View Post
LOL....A business/person should not be forced to do business with anyone they choose not to. Otherwise the person does not own the business or themselves, they are mere slaves/employees of the government thugs who tell them who they have to interact with.

Private property/business in the country is a fallacy. You have exclusive usage "privileges", as long as you subjugate yourself to the State. The minute that you do not behave like a good little slave, the iron fist of the government will take away your privileges. (Which the droolers believe are their rights, but they are "citizens" not "people". People have inalienable rights, citizens/subjects have privileges that can be taken away by the whim of their Masters.)
Having nothing to do with this subject, I am surprised how few people do not realize they are not free in the true meaning of the word.
For example, you can own the land and your house outright, yet run afoul of the local city ordinances and you will find out how quickly you are not. They can coerce you into doing whatever they demand. Fail to comply, and they will hit you with punitive liens to eventually take your home away.

---

As to this homosexual cake issue, it is just an effort to have activists push their liberal social agenda against anyone who thinks differently than they do. These people could obviously have gone to another business to have a cake made. Instead they chose to try and force these people to go against their religion/beliefs. For all we know, they may have refused to make a satanic themed cake, or even refused to make a cake for two unmarried hetero people who want a cake to celebrate their living together.

Last edited by CaseyB; 06-26-2017 at 12:19 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 10:38 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
Businesses can legally refuse to do business with customers as long as they don't violate anti discrimination laws. This means they cannot kick you out because of your race, religion, disability and other reasons that are written in law.
There is no federal law prohibiting discrimination against LGBT. As such, none of those are "suspect classes" eligible for federal judicial review. Therefore, the First Amendment's Right to exercise one's religion trumps any state law or policy infringing on that First Amendment Right.

That said, the business will lose LGBT and possibly some LGBT business as a result of such. That's a choice they'll have to make based on their religious beliefs, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 10:39 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Businesses have to abide by the laws in place in the locality that they operate.
Not when doing so violates the business owner's Constitutional Rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top