Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The lawsuit is posted on the link in the OP. Why don't you read it.
I did. I think it's a stretch to claim that she lost income because NYT gets advertising revenue when people read the piece in question. It's not as if she can seriously expect a share of advertising income anytime anyone anywhere publishes an opinion about her.
Awww, the half-term quitter needs some publicity. Either that or she's run through all her grifted money and needs more cash. The rubes must have stopped contributing to her personal slush fund (aka, SarahPAC). Hard to figure out why else she would wait over five years to bring this suit.
"Awww, the half-term quitter"
Did you call Obama, who quit TWICE a "the half-term quitter"?
Or Hillary?
Or any of the MANY dems who have "quit" to take a higher position?
Yes, it is long. I read it back in law school, and do not wish to again. However, it is the case that established that, even if a newspaper prints false statements, they are shielded from defamation cases by public individuals unless the defamed can prove that the paper acted with 'actual malice'.
It is a high standard, as the unanimous Court intended.
I doubt that Ms. Palin can overcome that hurdle.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.