Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2017, 01:04 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,206,841 times
Reputation: 18824

Advertisements

This in the LA Times today:

Quote:
To NATO allies, Trump offered an explicit commitment to the alliance’s founding principle of common defense, which he had failed to state unambiguously at a May meeting in Brussels. But he also again tweaked allies who he said were not contributing enough financially, taking credit for “billions and billions” coming into NATO as a result of his importuning members to pay more.
What's the point? This is stupid. If NATO member nations see no point in paying more, then why should they pay more?

The United States just keeps trying to shoehorn itself into the affairs of other regions. If the European nations don't value NATO as much as we do, then we're the idiots, not them! Why do Americans care more about Europe's security than the Europeans do? Again, these are our economic competitors, and spending billions of US taxpayer money on their defense while they take six week annual vacations and enjoy universal health coverage is insulting and SHOULD be insulting to the average American.

Trump puts North Korea on notice: U.S. weighing 'pretty severe' response - LA Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2017, 01:06 PM
 
9,329 posts, read 4,143,346 times
Reputation: 8224
Because Trump thinks that everyone should pay more - except him, of course. This is part of the problem of hiring an ignorant so-called businessman with no experience in government. He thinks of everything in terms of profit and winner-take-all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2017, 01:09 PM
 
17,344 posts, read 11,285,635 times
Reputation: 40990
Didn't they all agree to pay a certain amount when they joined NATO? So why is it ok for them to pay less, and we make up the difference? Does that make sense to you or are you just blindly harping on Trump no matter what the issue is? The name calling makes it hard to have a conversation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2017, 01:15 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,206,841 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
Didn't they all agree to pay a certain amount when they joined NATO? So why is it ok for them to pay less, and we make up the difference? Does that make sense to you or are you just blindly harping on Trump no matter what the issue is? The name calling makes it hard to have a conversation.
Who gives a damn about what they agreed to? They don't! The alliance is for THEIR security, not ours. So why do you want to demand that someone spends more money on their own security, and attempt to shame them into doing so by spending more of MY tax money when I don't need the damn alliance?

That's the height of stupidity. You can't see that?

People here want to gut entitlement spending, but they should be happy to kick in billions for NATO nations that don't wanna pony up? That makes sense to you?

You don't have universal healthcare, and you damn sure don't have six week paid vacations with cradle to grave social benefits....what other nation is subsidizing YOUR nation's defense while you vacation in Ibiza?

Get a clue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2017, 01:20 PM
 
17,344 posts, read 11,285,635 times
Reputation: 40990
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Who gives a damn about what they agreed to? They don't! The alliance is for THEIR security, not ours. So why do you want to demand that someone spends more money on their own security, and attempt to shame them into doing so by spending more of MY tax money when I don't need the damn alliance?

That's the height of stupidity. You can't see that?

People here want to gut entitlement spending, but they should be happy to kick in billions for NATO nations that don't wanna pony up? That makes sense to you?

You don't have universal healthcare, and you damn sure don't have six week paid vacations with cradle to grave social benefits....what other nation is subsidizing YOUR nation's defense while you vacation in Ibiza?

Get a clue.
IMO, NATO needs to be disbanded since it's a left over institution from the days of the Soviet Union when the U.S.S.R. was trying to expand westward. It's obsolete.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2017, 01:21 PM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,474,425 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Why does Trump keep browbeating NATO members to "pay more?"
Because that's his base wants to hear and what Bannon instructs him to Tweet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2017, 01:23 PM
 
9,742 posts, read 4,496,886 times
Reputation: 3981
Quote:
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
Didn't they all agree to pay a certain amount when they joined NATO? So why is it ok for them to pay less, and we make up the difference? Does that make sense to you or are you just blindly harping on Trump no matter what the issue is? The name calling makes it hard to have a conversation.
They agreed to get there spending up to 2 pct of GDP by I believe 2020.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2017, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,965 posts, read 75,205,836 times
Reputation: 66930
Quote:
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
IMO, NATO needs to be disbanded since it's a left over institution from the days of the Soviet Union when the U.S.S.R. was trying to expand westward. It's obsolete.
Have you missed the bit about Russia invading and annexing part of Ukraine?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2017, 01:31 PM
 
17,344 posts, read 11,285,635 times
Reputation: 40990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
Have you missed the bit about Russia invading and annexing part of Ukraine?
No I didn't miss that part at all. The Ukraine has been embroiled with Russia for many hundreds of years and was part of Russia off and on. It doesn't represent the rest of Europe. One could argue that the Ukraine is legitimately part of Russia if one wants to, not that I'm doing that. Those two countries have a very long love/hate relationship with each other and always will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2017, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Minnysoda
10,659 posts, read 10,729,131 times
Reputation: 6745
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
This in the LA Times today:



What's the point? This is stupid. If NATO member nations see no point in paying more, then why should they pay more?

The United States just keeps trying to shoehorn itself into the affairs of other regions. If the European nations don't value NATO as much as we do, then we're the idiots, not them! Why do Americans care more about Europe's security than the Europeans do? Again, these are our economic competitors, and spending billions of US taxpayer money on their defense while they take six week annual vacations and enjoy universal health coverage is insulting and SHOULD be insulting to the average American.

Trump puts North Korea on notice: U.S. weighing 'pretty severe' response - LA Times
If you are saying that we should pull out of NATO I agree 100%!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top