Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But we don't know the CIA's involvement has fully ended. We only know that the CIA is supposedly no longer "allowed" to be running guns and supplies to Syrian rebels.
It's bad enough that the CIA is involved in the Poppy Fields (Heroin) in Afghanistan but that's a whole different subject and thread. :-)
Amazing, regime change has been the go to foreign policy strategy since Harry S Truman was President. Almost 70 years. About time we tried some new strategies.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 24 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed
That has nothing to do with me. I may be liberal, but I think for myself, and I totally disagree with the stance towards Syria the mainstream Democrats are making. Assad is the legitimate President of Syria.
No, his father won a military coup, he isnt legitimate by any definition
Liberal Democrat Tulsi Gabbard defends Trump ending CIA program to arm anti Assad rebels!
So, her stance on the issue is liberal. Is that supposed to be surprising?
Trump went liberal on the issue, and his GOP loyalists follow him, and that only means they are abandoning the long held GOP foreign policy principles. They are becoming liberal, while Tulsi has always been one.
Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 07-25-2017 at 02:32 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.