Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I honestly don't know anything past those facts, but if the sea level actually fell, all that water had to go somewhere, either as vapor, liquid, or as solid ice. And it's a hell of a lot of water we are talking about here.
Captain Kirk and crew had to ferry that whale through time. Remember they built that big old aquarium on that Klingon ship for the whale to swim around in while in transit? Right there's where all the water went.
Captain Kirk and crew had to ferry that whale through time. Remember they built that big old aquarium on that Klingon ship for the whale to swim around in while in transit? Right there's where all the water went.
Best Trek movie back in 1986 out of all of them. Just too bad we will never get close to ever breaking the speed of light dwight.
The fact is that the earth hasn't warmed in about two decades and no study has ever proven a cause and effect relationship between atmospheric CO2 and global temperature increases.
I'm still waiting for an answer. Sea levels did rise. Since the sea is the bottom, where all water eventually goes, then were did all that water go when the seas dropped?
Does that decrease mean we are in for a sudden massive sea level rise when the water returns to the sea?
That's something that needs to be considered. The beach always dries up just before the tsunami rises and rolls in.
You need to read through the thread. I've already answered your question and others who have replied to this thread also have answered your question.
FWIW, I'll answer it again:
The OP posted a link to a story written by some outfit calling itself "Zero Hedge" - apparently a Wall Street connected outfit. Whatever Zero Hedge is doing, they either don't know how to read a simple graph or do 2nd grade addition and subtraction or else they are part of the denier misinformation gang hoping that their readers take them at their word.
I've learned to take no one's word for anything these days. A Wall Street outfit that can't do second grade arithmetic would be quickly consumed by the bears. Check the link that I gave in my earlier reply which is the same link given by OP's Zero Hedge gang. If you do, you'll see that according to NASA the world's ocean's have actually risen more than 6mm over the past two years - not fallen as Zero Brains Hedge would have you believe.
"Groundbreaking new findings announced Monday suggest the record-setting heat wave plaguing much of the United States may be due to radiation emitted from an enormous star located in the center of the solar system. Scientists believe the star, which they have named G2V65, may in fact be the same bright yellow orb seen arcing over the sky day after day, and given its extreme heat and proximity to Earth, it is likely not only to have caused the heat wave, but to be responsible for every warm day in human history."
"Q. How can we combine the data of the two stations above in a meaningful way?
A. What may be done before combining those data is to increase the new data or lower the old ones until the two series seem consistent. How much we have to adjust these data may be estimated by comparing the time period with reports from both stations: After the offset, the averages over the common period should be equal. (This is the basis for the GISS method). As new data become available, the offset determined using that method may change. This explains why additional recent data can impact also much earlier data in any regional or global time series. Another approach is to replace both series by their anomalies with respect to a fixed base period. This is the method used by the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU) in the UK. The disadvantage is that stations that did not report during that whole base period cannot be used."
Zero Hedge is based in eastern Europe and is suspected of being a Kremlin-sponsored propaganda site. Everything they write is cynical about the US, and is designed to undermine confidence in our institutions. How Do We Know Zero Hedge Is A Russian Information Operation?
With that in mind, it's no surprise Zero Hedge is a climate denier. Russia has a lot of oil to sell.
Zero Hedge is based in eastern Europe and is suspected of being a Kremlin-sponsored propaganda site. Everything they write is cynical about the US, and is designed to undermine confidence in our institutions. How Do We Know Zero Hedge Is A Russian Information Operation?
With that in mind, it's no surprise Zero Hedge is a climate denier. Russia has a lot of oil to sell.
Interestingly, Russia has signed the Paris accord, and it is sticking with it. They know how serious the problem of climate change really is.
This disinformation campaign through Zero and other sources is designed to disrupt our body politic. Many are gullible enough to fall for it, they are being played ...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
