Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Right now the majority of immigrants to the US ,at least half are from Latin America, about a Third are from Asia, and Europe and Africa are maybe 10% or less each.
Will Trump's raise act primarily make it so most new immigrants are from Asia or will it benefit other regions as well.
White Nationalist Richard Spencer opposes the Raise Act for that reason.
Right now the majority of immigrants to the US ,at least half are from Latin America, about a Third are from Asia, and Europe and Africa are maybe 10% or less each.
Will Trump's raise act primarily make it so most new immigrants are from Asia or will it benefit other regions as well.
White Nationalist Richard Spencer opposes the Raise Act for that reason.
Spencer seems like a goofball. A half loaf of bread is better than nothing.
My guess is we would get about the same number of immigrants from Asia and Europe that we are getting now since the total number would be cut in half, just the proportion from Asian would be very high maybe 80%. And we'd get a lot less from everywhere else.
But I do strongly agree that demographics and national origins should be taken into account like it was before the 1965 immigration changes. And since about at least 82% of immigrants should be European origin that would be a good way to lower total immigration further.
Spencer seems like a goofball. A half loaf of bread is better than nothing.
My guess is we would get about the same number of immigrants from Asia and Europe that we are getting now since the total number would be cut in half, just the proportion from Asian would be very high maybe 80%. And we'd get a lot less from everywhere else.
But I do strongly agree that demographics and national origins should be taken into account like it was before the 1965 immigration changes. And since about at least 82% of immigrants should be European origin that would be a good way to lower total immigration further.
Percentage wise I think the Asian and Hispanic proportions will switch. AS for Europe it might increase slightly from about 5% to 10-15%. India is likely to be a major benefactor since English is a 2nd language there.
Spencer seems like a goofball. A half loaf of bread is better than nothing.
My guess is we would get about the same number of immigrants from Asia and Europe that we are getting now since the total number would be cut in half, just the proportion from Asian would be very high maybe 80%. And we'd get a lot less from everywhere else.
But I do strongly agree that demographics and national origins should be taken into account like it was before the 1965 immigration changes. And since about at least 82% of immigrants should be European origin that would be a good way to lower total immigration further.
It's not about skin color. It's about immigrants whose native culture is compatible to ours and who are willing to assimilate into the mainstream culture.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
