Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-24-2017, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,253 posts, read 23,742,275 times
Reputation: 38639

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
so what? How many times to leftists have to be told that the issue wasn't with Hillary using a private account, but rather with Hillary passing classified information on said private account/server. Secondly, Kushner was not a White House employee, but rather someone working to ensure for a smooth transition when this happened (hell, Trump wasn't even sworn in then). Try harder.
Doesn't get any clearer than this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-24-2017, 09:46 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,847,766 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by take57 View Post
Faulty premise. At this writing no one knows if the situation is different. Let's get some subpoena's issued, get an investigation going so we know if laws were broken. Fair is fair, as you rightly point out.
once again you are wrong in this case, so far. has kushner been accused of hiding emails? has he been accused of erasing emails? has he been accused of distributing classified emails on an unprotected server?

these are things hillary has been accused of, and there is clear evidence that she did these things, in fact she even admitted to doing these things.

kushner on the other hand has not been accused of any wrongdoing. and until he is, there is really no reason to even investigate the issue. but lets say the feds were to take the case they have right now to a judge for a search warrant, the judge would turn them down until they got evidence that there might be wrongdoing, and that is not an article in a newspaper. is if there is reason to investigate, then do so. until then go away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2017, 10:00 PM
 
9,837 posts, read 4,638,052 times
Reputation: 7292
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
so what? How many times to leftists have to be told that the issue wasn't with Hillary using a private account, but rather with Hillary passing classified information on said private account/server. Secondly, Kushner was not a White House employee, but rather someone working to ensure for a smooth transition when this happened (hell, Trump wasn't even sworn in then). Try harder.
cool story bro but of the tens of thousands of email there was not one single important secret doc. not one. yep there were a few that were incorrectly marked, but nothing of note despite the endless lies from the right.

and guess what not a single charge was brought and guess what if there was a single chargeable offense SESSIONS could bring it, she has not been tried so if the slightest thing existed Sessions could go after her...

hmm i wonder why nobody is charging her...



and guess what not a single charge was brought and if there was a single chargeable offense SESSIONS could bring it, she has not been tried so if the slightest thing existed Sessions could go after her...

hmm i wonder why nobody is charging her...



and guess what not a single charge was brought and if there was a single chargeable offense SESSIONS could bring it, she has not been tried so if the slightest thing existed Sessions could go after her...

hmm i wonder why nobody is charging her...




and guess what not a single charge was brought and if there was a single chargeable offense SESSIONS could bring it, she has not been tried so if the slightest thing existed Sessions could go after her...

hmm i wonder why nobody is charging her...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2017, 10:27 PM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,719 posts, read 16,846,967 times
Reputation: 41863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
And the fact that she was cleared multiple times just goes over your head.
Nah, they know, they just choose to ignore facts and would rather go with "what they know".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2017, 11:19 PM
 
20,757 posts, read 8,583,738 times
Reputation: 14393
I didn't read the whole thread. If Jared wasn't working in the White House since Obama still lived there, and didn't have a White House email, what was he supposed to use? Carrier pigeon?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2017, 03:38 AM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,754,781 times
Reputation: 15667
As long as Hillary is not held accountable by any leftie there is no need to reply to any thread regarding anyone's private email issue on the Republican side as we know that lefties only have one narrative and are totally blind to hold any Democrat to the same standard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2017, 08:25 PM
 
Location: north central Ohio
8,665 posts, read 5,849,040 times
Reputation: 5201
Angry At Least 6 White House Advisers Used Private Email Accounts

WASHINGTON — At least six of President Trump’s closest advisers occasionally used private email addresses to discuss White House matters, current and former officials said on Monday.
The disclosures came a day after news surfaced that Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and adviser, used a private email account to send or receive about 100 work-related emails during the administration’s first seven months. But Mr. Kushner was not alone. Stephen K. Bannon, the former chief White House strategist, and Reince Priebus, the former chief of staff, also occasionally used private email addresses. Other advisers, including Gary D. Cohn and Stephen Miller, sent or received at least a few emails on personal accounts, officials said.
Moderator cut: copyright violation
At Least 6 White House Advisers Used Private Email Accounts


Can THEY SPELL[b] H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "LOCK THEM UP"!

Last edited by Ibginnie; 09-25-2017 at 09:29 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2017, 08:29 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,912,422 times
Reputation: 4942
Butter e-mails! The twist.

Bet no one expected to see this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2017, 08:34 PM
 
262 posts, read 307,839 times
Reputation: 579
Ivanka is going to look awful in orange
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2017, 08:39 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,957 posts, read 8,493,779 times
Reputation: 6777
Jared and Ivanka ...his and her servers! How romantic! They're with Her!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top