Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She is throwing Hillary, Shultz and the DNC under the bus. The question is why. And its probably true that the DNC came under Hillary's control in the summer of 2015. It fits the leaked emails and the way Bernie was screwed.
More than likely Brazille is trying to distance herself from the dossier scandal and any legal issues that may come her way.
One of the things that Brazile is doing is to make it Crystal Clear that anything that happened during the 2016 was under the TOTAL Control of the Clinton Campaign. Money, dirt, lies, strategy, GPSFusion. She is attempting to absolve herself and those who actually run the DNC. They want Hillary to shut up and go away, they are attempting to put as much distance as possible between the DNC and Wasserman Shultz, because it's very very likely she goes down for the business with the Awan brothers.
“Hello, senator. I’ve completed my review of the DNC and I did find the cancer,” I said. “But I will not kill the patient.”
The Cancer is Hillary Clinton, the Patient is the DNC ...... according to Donna Brazile.
Apparently Donna doesn't think it's "cancerous" to give Debate questions to the Candidate prior to the debate.
When I got back from a vacation in Martha’s Vineyard I at last found the document that described it all: the Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America.
The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.
I had been wondering why it was that I couldn’t write a press release without passing it by Brooklyn. Well, here was the answer.
The Corruption in Washington Politics is deep and very wide. Agencies weaponized, Party Corruption - do nothing Politicians that care ONLY for themselves and a Leftist Media that supports all of it and even promotes it.
One of the things that Brazile is doing is to make it Crystal Clear that anything that happened during the 2016 was under the TOTAL Control of the Clinton Campaign. Money, dirt, lies, strategy, GPSFusion. She is attempting to absolve herself and those who actually run the DNC. They want Hillary to shut up and go away, they are attempting to put as much distance as possible between the DNC and Wasserman Shultz, because it's very very likely she goes down for the business with the Awan brothers.
Well. Brazille is a liar. We already know this because of her leaking CNN debate questions to Clinton then lying about it until caught.
And of course there isn't anything close to being true. Bernie Sanders also used DNC resources that clearly were not under Clinton's control. If they were, then the DNC is guilty of breaking election laws.
It may be surprise you to discover that most liberals have no great love for Hillary Clinton. That’s why we’re so shocked that you conservatives seem so obsessed with her. You literally can’t stop talking about her, referring to her as “your queen”, and she just isn’t that popular amongst us. She was nominated largely because she was the anointed one and every competitive Democrat sat out the election.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 18 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,531,868 times
Reputation: 6032
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp
She knew what was going on well before being asked to take over. It doesn't excuse her cheating to help Hillary and there is still NO proof the Russians stole the emails.
.
We apparently read 2 different time lines/ articles.
The article is entirely about the DNC failing to adequately raise,use and distribute funds.
Quote:
As an aside......my wife is the treasurer of the local High School band boosters. She must provide a financial statement to every officer once a month. Donna can not claim ignorance here
You clearly didnt read the article and this line proves it.
I wish Bernie would have come out with it when he found out. Why he helped hide that and back Hilary is beyond me. Just sick how much trash work in these political camps. Fair doesn't exist in this country regarding elections.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_6BevfMygM
Hillarys just smiling like a Cheshire cat knowing how it all went down. Gross. At that moment a lot of Bernie supporters turned to Trump. I don't blame them at all. Most of us just realized there was no need to participate in the garbage clean up.
I am glad you think that the article is boring. If HRC had not taken the stance that she was "the party", DJT may not be President right now. But Oh Well, YAWN....
So, you're response is a straw man based on the same crap as this OP. Yep, yawn.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 18 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,531,868 times
Reputation: 6032
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisanicole1
I am glad you think that the article is boring. If HRC had not taken the stance that she was "the party", DJT may not be President right now. But Oh Well, YAWN....
What exactly in the article makes you believe that ?
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 18 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,531,868 times
Reputation: 6032
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeP
So, you're response is a straw man based on the same crap as this OP. Yep, yawn.
Its a weird argument that doesnt make sense unless the argument is that Clinton should have taken all the money her campaign was making for the DNC instead of some.
What exactly in the article makes you believe that ?
I still believe that HRC lost because well she was HRC and if anyone else ran against her DJT would not have won. There were MANY people who voted for DJT because he was not HRC and because they were sick and tired of certain families running our government and being entitled to do so.
That's what I believe, does not make that fact.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
