DOJ identifies 6 Russian officials behind DNC hack (supporters, doctor, status)

[Fiyero]

Originally Posted by skycaller23

The contents gleaned from that DNC hack show corruption within the party itself.
But the masses are being deflected with "Russia, Russia, Russia".

Not really, but you keep telling yourself that.

[BB_210]

Originally Posted by Fiyero

Lol, no it doesn't. It's already confirmed the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, it's now Congressional record, and yes you guys have been saying our Intel agencies are wrong and Russia never meddled in the election.

You guys are ALWAYS wrong.

Good luck with that.

[Fiyero]

Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould

You really need to get better material.

That would require them to have reality and facts on their side. They don't.

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by Fiyero

That would require them to have reality and facts on their side. They don't.

Then maybe you need to take your facts to the FBI, because they don't agree with you .....


Next...

[GotHereQuickAsICould]

Originally Posted by chucksnee

Then maybe you need to take your facts to the FBI, because they don't agree with you .....


Next...

What are you talking about? This is coming from the DOJ.

I realize the pace is increasing. But please try to keep up.

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould

Sigh.

It's not the indictments. It's the evidence that is already known.

So you're saying they have evidence of it, but are NOT gonna indict..

then what the hell is the reason for the investigation?

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould

This is all you got?

Calling a Congressman speaking at a Congressional hearing "fake?"

Informing a campaign that you have information is not collusion..

I could tell you I know someone making meth, that doesnt mean I'm making meth..

[GotHereQuickAsICould]

Originally Posted by pghquest

So you're saying they have evidence of it, but are NOT gonna indict..

then what the hell is the reason for the investigation?

Are you following any of this?

Who said they are not going to indict? There are several sealed indictments waiting right now.

Mueller is a stone cold player. He just moved his first pieces. There are other moves to come.

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould

Are you following any of this?

The released charges are for tax fraud and failure to disclose.. nothing even CLOSE to colluding..

Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould

Who said they are not going to indict? There are several sealed indictments waiting right now.

Mueller is a stone cold player. He just moved his first pieces. There are other moves to come.

And you just keep acting like you know what those indictments are for, and then assuming guilt, despite there being absolutely ZERO evidence of either..

tax fraud, is far different then the accusations being made

[WaldoKitty]

Originally Posted by Fiyero

That would require them to have reality and facts on their side. They don't.

Reality & Facts? Let's see....

• Did Russians cause Hillary Clinton to lose the election? - NOPE

• Has any proof ever been given that anyone in the Trump campaign was colluding with Russians to beat Hillary? - NOPE

• Has any of the 10s of 1000s of local BOEs across the USA produced any proof or evidence of Russian hacking - NOPE

• Has any of Trump's haters ever described how Russians forced the voters in battleground states to vote for Trump - NOPE

You lose son. No facts & reality on your side.