Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You are confusing scientific research with medical care. They are not the same. What good is all of our innovation when huge swaths of the population have no access to or cannot afford the treatments that result from them? We rank well behind every other developed nation in the world in actual medical care.
Maybe you misunderstand; we want to better care HERE. You know, I really try not to label conservatives as bad human beings, but you guys make it difficult.
I misunderstand nothing. Basing the level of care on WaPo articles and green card holding UN miscreants opinions is indicative of your lack of intelligence.
I know most people probably won't read this as it's from the NYT; however, it's a great article comparing 11 different health care systems. It pits similar ones against each other and then lets you pick which one you think is superior. It then comes down to a final winner at the end.
The U.S. system didn't fare the worst, but I do like that this article describes the pros and cons of each one in a way that I have never seen before, as well as also discusses the cost benefit ratio to what it delivers.
The U.S. system was definitely superior to the others for innovation and outcomes of serious diseases, which most people want. However, as I said earlier, it falls short with access to care and affordability to the general population.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.