Trump tried to stop Sessions from recusal story (Congress, ethical, illegal)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is an interesting development. While Don McGahn declined to comment on the story to the New York Times, I'm sure he will sing like a bird if questioned by the FBI. After all Trump, who on there right mind would lie for Trump given how he treats his allies? I'm hoping to will see Trump impeached before Spring.
These silly articles from CNN, and NYT only shows just how bad things are going to the Trump haters.
I was wondering what the FBI, and DOJ was going to turn over to congress, and if there would be any bombshells, but judging but the reactions of CNN, NYT, and WaPo, it could be pretty bad for the Mueller's investigation.
This is absolutely true. I remember how mad Trump was and how he said Sessions had let him down by recusing himself. Sessions was close to being fired over it.
I was wondering what the FBI, and DOJ was going to turn over to congress, and if there would be any bombshells, but judging but the reactions of CNN, NYT, and WaPo, it could be pretty bad for the Mueller's investigation.
Like I said, I don't know what will be turned over to congress, but it sure has all the Trump hating media outlets squirming.
I'm just reading the tea leaves, nothing more. Who knows, maybe I'm all wrong, but why are the usual suspects all worked up.
I was wondering what the FBI, and DOJ was going to turn over to congress, and if there would be any bombshells, but judging but the reactions of CNN, NYT, and WaPo, it could be pretty bad for the Mueller's investigation.
These silly articles from CNN, and NYT only shows just how bad things are going to the Trump haters.
If it was just one media outlet was anti-Trump, I could completely understand Trumps position calling them Fake News. But almost every respected news media publishing any negative publicity about Trump is labeled fake news. The Washington Post, CNN, The New York times, NBC, these are all highly respected, ethical sources of media, known for the journalistic integrity and all owned by separate corporations. Even FOX news, which tends to be pro-Trump stories, 52% of of it's news coverage on Trump was negative this year, vs 48% positive. The numbers for the other news outlets published were far more negative stories than positive. 98% ARD, 93% CNN, 93% NBC, 91% CBS, 87% New York Times, 84% Financial Times, 83% Washington Post, 74% BBC, 70% Wall Street Journal. To dismiss these media sources and believe anonymous sources of media on the internet, your just a fool, easily manipulated by lies and shiny objects.
Last edited by TechGromit; 01-04-2018 at 10:20 PM..
...Maybe one of you dems can explain to me what you think this story means?
What it means is that it's looking like Trump's illegal acts most likely had to do with obstructing justice rather than any issues with collusion.
If the Dems take the House, that will be the basis for his impeachment...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
