Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-28-2018, 06:28 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,174 posts, read 44,953,235 times
Reputation: 13743

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
So . . everyone changes at the school? No one goes home and comes back for practice?

You are determined to make a problem when there really isn't one.
That's because it IS a problem. Just one example:

Transgender Bathroom Policies: NYC Parents Balk and Ask, Locker/Shower Rooms Too? | Time.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-28-2018, 06:52 PM
 
Location: Townsville
6,803 posts, read 2,925,824 times
Reputation: 5536
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffbase40
We can refuse public accomodation based on a practice, an event or activity. That has NOTHING to do with the individual's personal identity which is the basis for discrimination law. A gay man walks into a pet store and tells the owner that he wants to buy some cute dogs to BBQ and eat them. The owner refuses to sell. The owner is not discriminating because the man is gay. He is discriminating against the practice.

Get the difference??
You're driven by your religious beliefs, Jeff, which, you've been told over and over again, are misguided. You harp on about 'sin', that homosexuality is 'a sin' and that Christians are to oppose 'sin' even when it comes to servicing the public as in a business refusing to accommodate a gay marriage. If the perceived 'sin' of another was the real reason behind refusing service to someone then that business would be refusing service to everyone since 'sinlessness' doesn't exist.

The above 'example' of one's differentiating between homosexuality per se and the 'practice' associated with homosexuality is silly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2018, 07:46 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,395,125 times
Reputation: 11384
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile View Post
Yeah, you know why? Because gays did not have the right to marry who they wanted, unlike heterosexuals. Duh.
Heterosexuals did not have the right to marry whom they wanted. They could only marry someone who agreed, and only someone of the opposite sex, and only if neither of them was married to someone else.

Same with homosexuals. They could marry anyone of the opposite sex who agreed to marry them, if they were both unmarried at the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2018, 07:53 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,395,125 times
Reputation: 11384
Quote:
Originally Posted by FluidFreedom View Post
The LGBTQ community have every right to be vocal about not being given the same rights as other citizens of the United States. Just as other minority groups have had to find for things, they are doing the same.
Don't give me this "minority" stuff.

The people who are not being given the same rights as other citizens are white people. We are now barely a majority of the USA's population, and we suffer ALL of the "legal" government-enforced discrimination in this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2018, 07:56 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,893,683 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by csignorelli View Post
So, by that measure, would you support a business owner whose sincerely-held religious beliefs compelled them to discriminate against the disabled, or interracial couples?
Why not add no religious discrimination against bigamist and pedophiles if we're just going to make up hypotheticals.

It's well established for like 2,000 years that homosexuality violates Christian beliefs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2018, 08:08 PM
 
4,851 posts, read 2,290,360 times
Reputation: 1588
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
Heterosexuals did not have the right to marry whom they wanted. They could only marry someone who agreed, and only someone of the opposite sex, and only if neither of them was married to someone else.

Same with homosexuals. They could marry anyone of the opposite sex who agreed to marry them, if they were both unmarried at the time.



You are being silly, and you know it.


Give it up. Your side lost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2018, 08:12 PM
 
Location: Houston
3,163 posts, read 1,730,866 times
Reputation: 2645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suburban_Guy View Post
I think it's more of Americans being fed up with the nonstop barrage of in your face petty drama and intolerance shown by the LGBTQ community than being uncomfortable with their lifestyles.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/amer...172719953.html
It starts from the top down. Trump (just as Reagan before him) has made it fashionable for the majority to feel superior to others that they may know little about. I’d like to see the poll details, but I would suspect that southerners and older ppl would be the most indifferent.

Last edited by Hopeful for Life; 01-28-2018 at 08:21 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2018, 08:13 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,395,125 times
Reputation: 11384
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverkris View Post
False dichotomy.

LGBT people just want to live their lives in dignity and safety.

Racists want to exclude or restrict other people based on their prejudices. That's not live and let live.
Excluding people and living in your own space while they live in theirs is "live and let live".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2018, 08:13 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,893,683 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallflash View Post
You are being silly, and you know it.


Give it up. Your side lost.
By a rogue and narrow SCOTUS decision or legislating. Not a fair loss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2018, 08:27 PM
 
4,851 posts, read 2,290,360 times
Reputation: 1588
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
By a rogue and narrow SCOTUS decision or legislating. Not a fair loss.



Its always a wrong, rogue, and unfair decision when its one your side lost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top