Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why didn't Obama tweet that he was sending pallets of cash to the Iranians?
Why are we talking about Obama? Trump is President now. Don’t change the topic. Trump won’t dare condemn Russia as he wants Putin to be his friend. He is waiting for his military Parade to show he’s a real clown.
Why are we talking about Obama? Trump is President now. Don’t change the topic. Trump won’t dare condemn Russia as he wants Putin to be his friend. He is waiting for his military Parade to show he’s a real clown.
If you think the United States being attacked by a hostile foreign entity is acceptable, you are no Anerican, comrade, and certainly not fit to be called a patriot.
Purchasing advertising and stating beliefs on social media does not constitute an "attack."
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog
It's called propaganda. Looks it up.
It's only propaganda if it is false, misleading or twisted.
For example, Liberals claiming the budget for the Department of Education was "slashed" even though its budget was increased 5% from the previous year. The fact that the budget was not increased by 7% as the Department requested, is not a budget cut.
Obama allowed Russia to try to influence the 2016 election. That needs to be looked at.
Well...that was OK, don'cha know, because Obama, bless his little heart, thought that the only possible beneficiary of any electoral shenanigans by the Russians would be Hillary.
Which is precisely why, when Hillary stood to benefit from Russian interference, you see...there was no chance whatsoever that the Russians could have possibly influenced the presidential election in any way. There were simply too many votes and the whole process was too decentralized for the Russians to affect it, he told us. The probability of the Russians successfully interfering in the election, from Obama's perspective in the fall of 2016, was less than being struck by lightning while being eaten alive by a Bengal tiger at the same time. We could set that possibility safely out of mind, he told us.
And questioning the result of the election, he told us, would be unpatriotic and would further undermine confidence in our public institutions, so we'd best get past these mistaken misapprehensions about this fictional Russian electoral bogeyman and get about the task of crowning Hillary! as our next president.
"Coats sat at a long table alongside the directors of the CIA, the FBI, and the head of the National Security Agency. All were in agreement: Russia had declared war on our country."
What do you think we're doing to Russia? Couldn't be the exact same thing could it?
Purchasing advertising and stating beliefs on social media does not constitute an "attack."
It's only propaganda if it is false, misleading or twisted.
For example, Liberals claiming the budget for the Department of Education was "slashed" even though its budget was increased 5% from the previous year. The fact that the budget was not increased by 7% as the Department requested, is not a budget cut.
That's a Paul Ryanism. The increase isn't as much as before so even though it's an increase we'll call it a decrease.
You know how Trump has a pet name for everyone? He doesn't have one for Vlad.
Perhaps that's because he secretly calls him BOSS.
Trump will NOT enforce the sanctions that Congress authorized back in August. He is a traitor to this country and should be imprisoned. I hope he at least gets impeached.
Purchasing advertising and stating beliefs on social media does not constitute an "attack."
It's only propaganda if it is false, misleading or twisted.
Well it was certainly misleading to pose as Americans. I haven't done an exhaustive study, but somehow I doubt at least some portion of the content wasn't false, misleading and twisted. The sheer numbers of posts make it disingenuous. I'm assuming they numbered in the millions.
Quote:
For example, Liberals claiming the budget for the Department of Education was "slashed" even though its budget was increased 5% from the previous year. The fact that the budget was not increased by 7% as the Department requested, is not a budget cut.
LOL, then Trump is the biggest source of propaganda in the world.
But since you brought up the school budget, cite your source. I see the school budget for 2017 down about 3.5% from 2016.
So according to your own definition, you're a source of propaganda yourself.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
