Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-26-2018, 10:32 PM
 
Location: Arizona
6,137 posts, read 3,865,359 times
Reputation: 4900

Advertisements

3,978,000 Births
47% Medicaid
1,869,000 Medicaid Babies per year.

So for the decade there is likely to be over 18 million babies born to mothers who are so poor that Medicaid is paying for the baby.

Most of those 18 million Medicaid babies being born in the 2010s, will start having massive amounts of babies in the 2030s.

The 2030s will be interesting with the 2010s becoming criminals and having baby after baby while the system is overwhelmed already with baby-boomers on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

Don't they know that a baby costs more than a Bentley? I guess not since the government is raising 47% or more than children these days.

https://www.caranddriver.com/bentley

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money...ent/357243002/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2018, 11:32 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,740,361 times
Reputation: 13868
Medicaid babies and illegal immigration = Democrat. The U.S. will surely become socialist
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2018, 11:42 PM
 
5,717 posts, read 3,147,283 times
Reputation: 7374
And then they blame "the rich" for having a bunch of babies they can't afford.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 12:08 AM
 
Location: Arizona
6,137 posts, read 3,865,359 times
Reputation: 4900
Quote:
Originally Posted by neko_mimi View Post
And then they blame "the rich" for having a bunch of babies they can't afford.
Yep, hopefully they pay for middle-class tax cuts by making massive welfare cuts to family welfare programs.

At least giving millionaires and billionaires tax cuts increases share prices on the middle-class. Business tax cuts raise share prices also which is good for share prices also.

Would be perfect if they would completely eliminate family welfare programs like section 8, TANF and WIC to pay for President Trump's tax cuts.

No reason for tax cuts to cost money when they could have made them revenue neutral with elimination of family welfare programs.

18 million plus Medicaid children being born into poverty or near-poverty each decade because these women know that having a Medicaid baby puts them first-in-line for lots of prizes including.

-Big housing vouchers of $2500 or more monthly or $30,000 plus per year in some areas that they can rent for as little as $25.

-Complementary birth paid for by Medicaid and high healthcare premiums for employers

-Complementary Utilities for a program that designed to help seniors originally

-$1,000 or more per month in free food if you have 4 or more children for all their filet mignon and lobster needs

-Free fast food in many states from EBT

-TANF which in many instances go wasted on things like alcohol and illegal drugs

-Free childcare and Free education

-Non-profit organizations that get special tax breaks are lining up to give them lots of goodies for free

The list goes on and on. The dictionary of welfare programs for women nationwide who have multi-babies is likely much larger than the bloated, complicated federal tax code.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 12:42 AM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,368,921 times
Reputation: 14459
That's a sobering statistic.

People greatly underestimate the money, infrastructure, time, security and stability it takes to even consider bringing a life into the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 01:26 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,957 posts, read 8,494,901 times
Reputation: 6777
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovecrowds View Post
Yep, hopefully they pay for middle-class tax cuts by making massive welfare cuts to family welfare programs.

At least giving millionaires and billionaires tax cuts increases share prices on the middle-class. Business tax cuts raise share prices also which is good for share prices also.

Would be perfect if they would completely eliminate family welfare programs like section 8, TANF and WIC to pay for President Trump's tax cuts.

No reason for tax cuts to cost money when they could have made them revenue neutral with elimination of family welfare programs.

18 million plus Medicaid children being born into poverty or near-poverty each decade because these women know that having a Medicaid baby puts them first-in-line for lots of prizes including.

-Big housing vouchers of $2500 or more monthly or $30,000 plus per year in some areas that they can rent for as little as $25.

-Complementary birth paid for by Medicaid and high healthcare premiums for employers

-Complementary Utilities for a program that designed to help seniors originally

-$1,000 or more per month in free food if you have 4 or more children for all their filet mignon and lobster needs

-Free fast food in many states from EBT

-TANF which in many instances go wasted on things like alcohol and illegal drugs

-Free childcare and Free education

-Non-profit organizations that get special tax breaks are lining up to give them lots of goodies for free

The list goes on and on. The dictionary of welfare programs for women nationwide who have multi-babies is likely much larger than the bloated, complicated federal tax code.
So you'll take the lead in showing the poor how to save money, by having your wife deliver your next kid on the couch which is covered with a plastic paint tarp. Lovecrowds Jr. can cut the cord. See ...it's so easy!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 03:30 AM
 
Location: Sector 001
15,946 posts, read 12,293,021 times
Reputation: 16109
Knowledge is power. Wealthy people tend to be more intelligent and better with their money. Poor people eat, sleep, and breed.

Personal development work necessitates the need to reduce short term gratifications in favor of long term goals. People that do this shouldn't have to give all their money away to people who decide to just eat, sleep, and breed, but nonetheless this is how society operates now.

It would be nice if we could simply be able to read people's intentions and give them aid or not based on whether they are making a good effort to find work, better themselves, etc. versus if they are purposely trying to milk the system, and we could cut them off.

Mind reading would be so useful, since people are such liars and deceivers. It would be nice to be able to cut off all shady characters from aid and kind of outcast them so we can have honorable people of good character breeding. As it stands it's almost the opposite in today's society... actually not just in today's society.. through all of human history, all million plus years of our evolution, nice guys, honest people, etc. were the ones NOT breeding.. nature doesn't care if you're honest, it cares if you get ahead and do whatever you can to plant your seed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 04:04 AM
 
Location: Wartrace,TN
8,069 posts, read 12,787,809 times
Reputation: 16513
There are over 74 million people in the U.S. on medicaid. That is roughly 23% of the population or almost 1 in 4. There are only roughly 121 million people that pay income tax in this country so each tax payer is supporting 61% of the cost for this "free" medical care. We spend more on medicaid than we do on defense. (Medicare is not included in this figure)


I believe that one of the requirements of being on medicaid should be norplant. Is that cruel? If a woman wants children she can get off of medicaid and support them like the rest of us. If she can't support them she has no business having more of them.

To be fair I suggest that any man on medicaid should be required to have a vasectomy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 04:26 AM
 
6,393 posts, read 4,116,131 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Medicaid babies and illegal immigration = Democrat. The U.S. will surely become socialist
What are you talking about? Single moms tend to vote Republicans because they tend to be religious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 04:55 AM
 
Location: Somewhere extremely awesome
3,130 posts, read 3,075,763 times
Reputation: 2472
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovecrowds View Post
3,978,000 Births
47% Medicaid
1,869,000 Medicaid Babies per year.

So for the decade there is likely to be over 18 million babies born to mothers who are so poor that Medicaid is paying for the baby.

Most of those 18 million Medicaid babies being born in the 2010s, will start having massive amounts of babies in the 2030s.

The 2030s will be interesting with the 2010s becoming criminals and having baby after baby while the system is overwhelmed already with baby-boomers on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

Don't they know that a baby costs more than a Bentley? I guess not since the government is raising 47% or more than children these days.

https://www.caranddriver.com/bentley

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money...ent/357243002/
You realize that younger people tend to make less money, and also tend to have more babies, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top