Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-27-2018, 08:36 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,047 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
Well, when I asked the county clerks if they register anything other than real estate, they said, "No."
I guess they made a mistake.
Actually, our county does. Automobiles, boats, trailers, etc., are listed on the county property tax rolls and the owners are assessed a property tax on them every year. Can't renew your DMV registration (entirely separate, and paid to the state) until you've paid the property tax on said items to the county collector.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2018, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,029 posts, read 14,213,258 times
Reputation: 16752
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
It's all semantics. And that's all a person who believes he is free has.
You must have insolated yourself (or as I call it...reduced your statist footprint) to a very low level or else you'd be dead or in prison by now.
I simply withdrew consent back in 1993. My servant government doesn't bother me. Why should it?
I don't trespass upon the rights of others.

Don't believe me - go read law, available at any county courthouse law library.
If I went back in time to 1990, and told myself, I wouldn't believe me, either. But if you do go to the courthouse law library, remember to wear knee pads and "Depends" (adult diapers) ... you may fall to your knees, weeping, or pee yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2018, 08:43 AM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,373,891 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
I simply withdrew consent back in 1993. My servant government doesn't bother me. Why should it?
I don't trespass upon the rights of others.

Don't believe me - go read law, available at any county courthouse law library.
If I went back in time to 1990, and told myself, I wouldn't believe me, either. But if you do go to the courthouse law library, remember to wear knee pads and "Depends" (adult diapers) ... you may fall to your knees, weeping, or pee yourself.
You can't withdrawal consent when you never gave it.

Do you drive? If so, what happens if a police officer attempts to pull you over?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2018, 08:45 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,230,847 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
IDEOLOGICAL THIEVES
=\\=\\=\\=\\=\\=
A popular mantra among the Left Wing is that NO ONE CAN OWN LAND.

That is completely wrong.

Without absolute ownership and the right to exclude others, there is nothing to stop predation and vandalism.

Without the "right to own" the farmer has no "right" to exclude the herdsman from trampling his crops with his herd. The herdsman has no "right" to prevent hunters from killing and taking his animals. All that remains are primitive hunter - gatherers in perpetual conflict over the planet "nobody can own."

Ownership and exclusion are vital to civilization.
No piece of land can simultaneously be used for shelter, grazing, farming, hunting, gathering, wildlife, and / or transportation.

The REAL GOAL of the Left Wing is to persuade the owners to surrender ownership to the collectivist STATE, so it can rule the (m)asses.

Do not fall for it. Defend absolute ownership of private property, for if you can’t absolutely own yourself, your labor, and the fruits of that labor, who does own you and yours?

(You have no right to life, if you have no land upon which to live! All you have is a privilege, subject to the landlord. And your progeny will have no nation to live within, when others take the land for their own posterity.)
So this destroys the lefts own argument that the land was stolen from the Indians.

Co.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2018, 08:47 AM
 
Location: San Diego
18,741 posts, read 7,617,731 times
Reputation: 15011
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
IDEOLOGICAL THIEVES

A popular mantra among the Left Wing is that NO ONE CAN OWN LAND.
It's actually that NO ONE CAN OWN ANYTHING.

Government must provide people everything, and people must obey the government, who will make all important decisions for their lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2018, 08:59 AM
 
4,345 posts, read 2,796,073 times
Reputation: 5821
They all want to share the land until it is time to work the land. Then they don't want to share it so much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2018, 09:04 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,047 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troyfan View Post
They all want to share the land until it is time to work the land. Then they don't want to share it so much.
Or pay the taxes on the land. The owner pays. The public uses it for free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2018, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,758,281 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
IDEOLOGICAL THIEVES
=\\=\\=\\=\\=\\=
A popular mantra among the Left Wing is that NO ONE CAN OWN LAND.

That is completely wrong.

Without absolute ownership and the right to exclude others, there is nothing to stop predation and vandalism.

Without the "right to own" the farmer has no "right" to exclude the herdsman from trampling his crops with his herd. The herdsman has no "right" to prevent hunters from killing and taking his animals. All that remains are primitive hunter - gatherers in perpetual conflict over the planet "nobody can own."

Ownership and exclusion are vital to civilization.
No piece of land can simultaneously be used for shelter, grazing, farming, hunting, gathering, wildlife, and / or transportation.

The REAL GOAL of the Left Wing is to persuade the owners to surrender ownership to the collectivist STATE, so it can rule the (m)asses.

Do not fall for it. Defend absolute ownership of private property, for if you can’t absolutely own yourself, your labor, and the fruits of that labor, who does own you and yours?

(You have no right to life, if you have no land upon which to live! All you have is a privilege, subject to the landlord. And your progeny will have no nation to live within, when others take the land for their own posterity.)
“ A popular mantra among the Left Wing is that NO ONE CAN OWN LAND”

What’s your source?

Only group of people I know who seem to believe this are the so called Soverign Citizens who don’t identify Right or Left and don’t vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2018, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,221 posts, read 19,219,451 times
Reputation: 14915
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
From the Communist manifesto: "In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."
https://www.marxists.org/archive/mar...ist-manifesto/

And when government "takes" property and does not pay just compensation, it is prima facie evidence that the property is NOT private property, constitutionally protected. (See: Fifth amendment)

Connect the dots.
"Left Wing" and "Communist" are not synonyms. That's where I was confused. Thanks.

Back to your delusion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2018, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,758,281 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
Here we go again with the libruz=commies crapola. Can't you guys find anything original to whine about?
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome View Post
Why are you trying to take people's private land to build a wall?
I often wondered if the projected cost of building the wall includes the aquisistion of land and the court battles to do so.

The so called Bush Wall contains miles of gaps to accommodate connected owners, a university, country clubs, HOAs and private ranches.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top