Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo
It's not because I say so.
Hannity didn't want his name made public.
|
You missed my meaning. I'll explain. What I mean is that qualifying a personal relationship or an attorney client relationship as sneaky is a non-thing, because those relationships are by definition private. As in, if you don't know then its because you nor anyone hasn't a right to know. Are the liberal journalists now or before disclosing their personal relationships to the public?
Really? Because you were so upset that you started an entire thread over supposed shared "legal ties" that don't exist and nebulous "questions" that need to be answered. That's pretty upset.
Your response indicates that you don't know how to respond to a critique of those assertions. Though, I get that you get aroused at active attempts toward making others upset (and then imagining a larger reaction). As indicated by your hilarious letter play that truly is always fresh and exciting after the millionth time that you write it. Ouchy. tRump. Cause Rump! Get it!
:
Geez. Look how upset you done made us.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
