Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-20-2018, 09:10 PM
 
Location: Proxima Centauri
5,772 posts, read 3,223,143 times
Reputation: 6115

Advertisements

When I try to watch this site on youtube, youtube asks for a password

The website is of a Netanyahu guarantee that taking out Iraq is a good thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHmhf_wrcrM

If I try more than twice it does come up.
Someone doesn't want us to see it.

Is anyone else having this experience?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2018, 07:20 AM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,825,064 times
Reputation: 4824
Netanyahu was obviously wrong. Going into Iraq was one of (if not THE) worst mistakes Bush ever made during his presidency, though I think being heavily influenced by Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld played a huge role in it. Those guys were itching for war from the moment Bush took the oath of office and 9/11 just made it much easier for them to eventually have their way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2018, 07:45 AM
 
Location: Somewhere below Mason/Dixon
9,471 posts, read 10,805,387 times
Reputation: 15980
Quote:
Originally Posted by LM117 View Post
Netanyahu was obviously wrong. Going into Iraq was one of (if not THE) worst mistakes Bush ever made during his presidency, though I think being heavily influenced by Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld played a huge role in it.
Iraq was harboring terrorists and likely did have the chemical weapons. They had months to move them all to Syria and as we k ow there are a lot of them there. Iraq was very belligerent toward the US after 9-11 and was indeed a potential threat. The decision to invade Iraq was a legitimate one. Most Americans in 2003 agreed with this as did most politicians who voted to authorize the war. It was an aggressive climate then in the wake of watching our nation suffer a massive unprovoked attack of the likes not seen since Pearl Harbor. Legitimate anger and a legitimate response IMO.

Liberals often cite the Iraq war as a failure and compare it to Vietnam. Well that is wrong, Iraq is a democratic state which has a cooperative government. The ISIS unrest had nothing to do with the US/ Iraq war but rather it spilled over from Syrias civil war and they have come together and dealt with that. No doubt that Iraq today is growing into a more successful nation, though problems remain. The reason these lefties like to call Iraq a loss and a failure is simple......they want to score political points. How disrespectful to the hundreds of thousands of veterans who fought and bled in the Iraq war. Pathetic. The Iraq war was a military victory and I thank those who served in our armed forces (and our allies) for doing thier duties well.

Was it worth the blood and treasure? Was it done proper? These are the areas where there is more legitimate concerns. Many believe a larger force should have been used to end the war quicker, it should not have taken 6 years to quell the resistance. Billions were spent and thousands of Americans were killed. When Iraq became a tough fought war many pro Iraq war Americans suddenly didn’t support it. We need to stick to our guns when we make decisions, if we decide wat is necessary we fight until we win. If we don’t have that level of commitment then we should not be doing it. Hillary Clinton is a perfect example of this, once she voted for and supported the war she should have supported the efforts to its successful conclusion. If you can’t support it when things get tough then don’t support it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2018, 09:35 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by danielj72 View Post
Iraq was harboring terrorists and likely did have the chemical weapons. They had months to move them all to Syria and as we k ow there are a lot of them there. Iraq was very belligerent toward the US after 9-11 and was indeed a potential threat. The decision to invade Iraq was a legitimate one. Most Americans in 2003 agreed with this as did most politicians who voted to authorize the war. It was an aggressive climate then in the wake of watching our nation suffer a massive unprovoked attack of the likes not seen since Pearl Harbor. Legitimate anger and a legitimate response IMO.
Cheney himself told us time after time after time that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, finding the plotters of which should have been our main focus at the time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielj72 View Post
Liberals often cite the Iraq war as a failure and compare it to Vietnam. Well that is wrong, Iraq is a democratic state which has a cooperative government. The ISIS unrest had nothing to do with the US/ Iraq war but rather it spilled over from Syrias civil war and they have come together and dealt with that. No doubt that Iraq today is growing into a more successful nation, though problems remain. The reason these lefties like to call Iraq a loss and a failure is simple......they want to score political points. How disrespectful to the hundreds of thousands of veterans who fought and bled in the Iraq war. Pathetic. The Iraq war was a military victory and I thank those who served in our armed forces (and our allies) for doing thier duties well.
The Iraq invasion/occupation was every bit the mistake Vietnam was, thankfully it cost far fewer American lives. WHY should any American taxpayer give a rat's ass if Iraq is a "democratic state" at our expense? NO WHERE does the Constitution task us with bringing democracy to others and it's a damn silly thing to do considering we don't have a democracy ourselves.

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielj72 View Post
Was it worth the blood and treasure? Was it done proper? These are the areas where there is more legitimate concerns. Many believe a larger force should have been used to end the war quicker, it should not have taken 6 years to quell the resistance. Billions were spent and thousands of Americans were killed. When Iraq became a tough fought war many pro Iraq war Americans suddenly didn’t support it. We need to stick to our guns when we make decisions, if we decide wat is necessary we fight until we win. If we don’t have that level of commitment then we should not be doing it. Hillary Clinton is a perfect example of this, once she voted for and supported the war she should have supported the efforts to its successful conclusion. If you can’t support it when things get tough then don’t support it.

HOW do you do a war 'proper' when it's a war you have no business starting in the first place?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2018, 09:44 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
The neo-cons were anxious for a war from the get go.

When they were trying to frighten everyone with talk of WMD, they weren't talking about chemical weapons that were moved and hidden in Syria, they were talking about mushroom clouds and yellowcake from Niger -- nuclear weapons.

Cheney and Rumsfeld trotted that lying con man Chabali around. Where did he ever end up?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2018, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,825,064 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
The neo-cons were anxious for a war from the get go.
Hell, even Bush 41 doesn’t care for Cheney or Rumsfeld.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...eacham/414343/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2018, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,825,064 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Cheney himself told us time after time after time that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, finding the plotters of which should have been our main focus at the time.



The Iraq invasion/occupation was every bit the mistake Vietnam was, thankfully it cost far fewer American lives. WHY should any American taxpayer give a rat's ass if Iraq is a "democratic state" at our expense? NO WHERE does the Constitution task us with bringing democracy to others and it's a damn silly thing to do considering we don't have a democracy ourselves.




HOW do you do a war 'proper' when it's a war you have no business starting in the first place?
Exactly. When even Trump says that going into Iraq was a mistake, that’s when you know you really f’ed up! Lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2018, 06:11 AM
 
Location: Proxima Centauri
5,772 posts, read 3,223,143 times
Reputation: 6115
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
The neo-cons were anxious for a war from the get go.

When they were trying to frighten everyone with talk of WMD, they weren't talking about chemical weapons that were moved and hidden in Syria, they were talking about mushroom clouds and yellowcake from Niger -- nuclear weapons.

Cheney and Rumsfeld trotted that lying con man Chabali around. Where did he ever end up?
I agree.
According to Paul O'Neil first Secretary of the Treasury, the attack on Iraq was being planned from day 1 of his tenure. This was well before 9/11.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top