Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No we don't because we aren't biased and blindly follow someone just because of the letter after their name like you Leftists do. Leftists are responsible for people like Stalin and Hitler coming to power due to the same reasons.
Looks as if the entire Russia conspiracy was being orchestrated by the Obama administration.
Nothing more to the Russians than Obama & the Democrats using all their power to thwart the election, just like they did their own primary against Bernie.
No wonder Comey wants Democrats to win in November so bad. Republican keeping house and senate means people getting in trouble for putting the country through the Russia mania and abusing powers.
Yep. Comey knows his only chance is the D's getting power and shutting down all the investigations into govt corruption. It's his only hope.
Despite the flashy headline, the article says no such thing. It’s an opinion piece that fails to identify a single piece of “materially false” information. It simply opines that the FISA warrant was fatally flawed because it referred to “politically motivated sources” instead of expressly naming the DNC as a source of funding for the Steele Dossier and argues that it should not have cited a news report in the application (although the article was used as proof only that certain allegations were public knowledge, not that the article bolstered the credibility of the allegations - a critical, yet ignored distinction). Not one piece of “materially false” information is singled out.
Frankly, if quibbling over this type of thing is the best challenge to the legitimacy of the Page FISA warrant that can be mounted, it further informs me that it was legitimate after all.
I have a lot of respect for Mollie Hemingway. Smart woman ...always spot on. Love her pieces in The Federalist.
Of course we've known this for a long time, but the Democraps denied it (of course). "Pencil Neck" (Adam Shciff ...or is it Shiftless?) has been the primary obstructor to getting to the truth in this investigation.
Despite the flashy headline, the article says no such thing. It’s an opinion piece that fails to identify a single piece of “materially false” information. It simply opines that the FISA warrant was fatally flawed because it referred to “politically motivated sources” instead of expressly naming the DNC as a source of funding for the Steele Dossier and argues that it should not have cited a news report in the application (although the article was used as proof only that certain allegations were public knowledge, not that the article bolstered the credibility of the allegations - a critical, yet ignored distinction). Not one piece of “materially false” information is singled out.
Frankly, if quibbling over this type of thing is the best challenge to the legitimacy of the Page FISA warrant that can be mounted, it further informs me that it was legitimate after all.
It's very simple. The FBI can only submit "evidence" to get a FISA warrant if it's been verified as accurate. In the application a redacted FBI exec, as well as James Comey & Sally Yates, all signed their names certifying the evidence presented was verified and accurate.
The problem is it wasn't verified as accurate. We know this because the author of the evidence Christopher Steele said it was unverified, but could be true? James Comey testified after the application that the Russian 'dossier' was unverified at the time of the FISA application. Bill Priestap said verification of the Russian 'dossier' was "In it's infancy" at the time of the FISA application.
The FBI lied to the FISA court, plain and simple.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.