Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-25-2018, 03:48 PM
 
11,986 posts, read 5,325,897 times
Reputation: 7284

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
In other words you're saying that the FBI and CIA run the country, and the rest of us just better get out of the way.

What I would say is, it's impossible for "the politicians" to go too far in this regard. The FBI and CIA are supposed to be subordinate to "the politicians" and, more importantly, the people.
No. The so-called “Deep State” agencies are charged with enforcing the law. They don’t go “rogue”. All of their actions have to be based on legislation, or on Federal regulations based upon law, and are subject to review by an independent judiciary.

You didn’t elect a king, though at times he seems to think he is one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-25-2018, 05:14 PM
 
34,289 posts, read 19,449,708 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
In other words you're saying that the FBI and CIA run the country, and the rest of us just better get out of the way.

What I would say is, it's impossible for "the politicians" to go too far in this regard. The FBI and CIA are supposed to be subordinate to "the politicians" and, more importantly, the people.
"in other words" followed by utter nonsense. Go READ what I said. I said that the CIA and FBI are upset because the politicians are interfering with the LAW. Something everyone should condemn. The FBI is investigating illegal activities. You know...Theyre doing their JOB. Not running the country.


But hey if you want to defend illegal activity feel free. But dont put words into my mouth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 07:38 PM
 
18,567 posts, read 7,432,243 times
Reputation: 11388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Burr has access to classified information as head of the Senate intel committee, evidently he saw things differently than Nunes.
No, that's not evident. You're presuming good faith, and there's no reason to do that with a US Senator.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 07:39 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,938,747 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
No. The so-called “Deep State” agencies are charged with enforcing the law. They don’t go “rogue”. All of their actions have to be based on legislation, or on Federal regulations based upon law, and are subject to review by an independent judiciary.

You didn’t elect a king, though at times he seems to think he is one.
Indeed.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 07:41 PM
 
18,567 posts, read 7,432,243 times
Reputation: 11388
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
"in other words" followed by utter nonsense. Go READ what I said. I said that the CIA and FBI are upset because the politicians are interfering with the LAW. Something everyone should condemn. The FBI is investigating illegal activities. You know...Theyre doing their JOB. Not running the country.

But hey if you want to defend illegal activity feel free. But dont put words into my mouth.
You said it. I didn't.

You said nothing about "the law", and one certainly can't presume that the activities of the FBI have anything to do with the law (even though they are supposed to), and the CIA isn't even supposed to have anything to do with law enforcement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 07:46 PM
 
18,567 posts, read 7,432,243 times
Reputation: 11388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
No. The so-called “Deep State” agencies are charged with enforcing the law. They don’t go “rogue”.
No, they are not charged with enforcing the law. The DOJ/FBI is, but not the rest. And OBVIOUSLY the FBI does sometimes go rogue. We've known that for decades. Hoover, Mueller, Comey -- the FBI is usually run by sleazeballs.

Oh, wait -- maybe by "going rogue" you mean doing their actual job instead of following the director's political agenda. In that case, you might be right that they don't go rogue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 08:12 PM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
3,614 posts, read 1,747,631 times
Reputation: 2740
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason3000 View Post
Since no one will touch this question in the other thread I'll ask it here....

Yes or no? Was the Russian 'dossier' "verified as accurate" at the time of the original FISA application?
No.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2018, 08:26 PM
 
79,909 posts, read 44,385,397 times
Reputation: 17209
It's crazy how some are so willing to give up their Constitutionally protected rights of privacy to further their politics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2018, 05:08 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,405 posts, read 26,409,332 times
Reputation: 15709
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
No, that's not evident. You're presuming good faith, and there's no reason to do that with a US Senator.
One of the errors in this line of thought is that at some point you need to trust in congress and the FBI, you will never have access to all the information while an investigation is in progress. Its one thing to be cynical its quite another to claim there is always some underlying reason when someone disagrees with your opinion.


We are at a point now where some people will not ever be convinced of anything regardless of the facts presented.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2018, 05:35 AM
 
18,567 posts, read 7,432,243 times
Reputation: 11388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
One of the errors in this line of thought is that at some point you need to trust in congress and the FBI, you will never have access to all the information while an investigation is in progress.
No, there is never a point at which you "have to" trust Congress or the FBI. They're not trustworthy. There is, however, a point at which you have to accept that you can't know something because there is no trustworthy source. I'm comfortable with that.

Last edited by hbdwihdh378y9; 07-26-2018 at 06:25 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top