Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-24-2018, 11:01 PM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,601,522 times
Reputation: 7801

Advertisements

Yeah but nobody cares.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-24-2018, 11:03 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,575 posts, read 17,293,027 times
Reputation: 37334
The doorman?
Really? Who in the world is going to believe the Dems this time? I mean, besides about 3 posters on CD Forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 11:13 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by CALGUY View Post
Right, and I'M a gay guy that knocked up queen Lizzie.
Give me a brake.

The trump haters eat this kind of sh.. up.
They must be having an orgasm.

Bob.
I'm a Trump "strong disliker" and I take this story with a big box of salt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 11:22 PM
 
8,059 posts, read 3,946,325 times
Reputation: 5356
EVERYONE knows that this doorman was released from his exclusivity clause with AMI prior to last April 11th.

Beyond the physical document, this CNN story is an artful and willful lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 11:23 PM
 
26,582 posts, read 14,449,955 times
Reputation: 7435
not much to support the doorman's story presently. from what i've seen it's just a claim that someone told him the housekeeper had a child with trump, no direct knowledge. but..... i'm sure media outlets will attempt to track down contemporaneous trump tower employees to test the validity of the claim ( if non-disclosures were standard practice for trump employees then expect anonymous sources ) .


i'm curious why the national enquirer dropped this one and if there's more "catch and kill" stories about to come out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 11:35 PM
 
26,582 posts, read 14,449,955 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultor View Post
EVERYONE knows that this doorman was released from his exclusivity clause with AMI prior to last April 11th.

what's the evidence to support the claim?



from the OP link:


"In April, Sajudin told CNN he claims to have knowledge of a relationship Trump had with his former housekeeper that resulted in a child.
At the time, AMI called Sajudin's story "not credible" and denied any connection between the story and Trump and his then-personal attorney Michael Cohen."

so, sajudin was offering no specifics back in april, which would seem odd if he was released from his contract.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 11:38 PM
 
8,059 posts, read 3,946,325 times
Reputation: 5356
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
not much to support the doorman's story presently. from what i've seen it's just a claim that someone told him the housekeeper had a child with trump, no direct knowledge. but..... i'm sure media outlets will attempt to track down contemporaneous trump tower employees to test the validity of the claim ( if non-disclosures were standard practice for trump employees then expect anonymous sources ) .


i'm curious why the national enquirer dropped this one and if there's more "catch and kill" stories about to come out.
This one wasn't "catch and kill".

The doorman has been free to talk since early April.

The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Associated Press, and the New Yorker all have tried (and failed) to verify the story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 11:46 PM
 
26,582 posts, read 14,449,955 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultor View Post
The doorman has been free to talk since early April.

then what do you believe has changed since april? doesn't make sense to have a lawyer make a statement that a client is released from a contract if it's been the case for over 4 months.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 11:47 PM
 
8,059 posts, read 3,946,325 times
Reputation: 5356
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
what's the evidence to support the claim?



from the OP link:


"In April, Sajudin told CNN he claims to have knowledge of a relationship Trump had with his former housekeeper that resulted in a child.
At the time, AMI called Sajudin's story "not credible" and denied any connection between the story and Trump and his then-personal attorney Michael Cohen."

so, sajudin was offering no specifics back in april, which would seem odd if he was released from his contract.
April 12, 2018 (bold mine):

Trump Tower doorman: They told me not to talk about housekeeper who allegedly had Trump's child

AMI's chief content officer, Dylan Howard, said in a statement: "It is a disconcerting view of the level of hysteria and partisanship in American politics that not reporting a story that multiple media outlets have now also confirmed to be untrue has become headline news."

"Paying for information has long been a practice of The National Enquirer and to suggest that it has only paid for, and not run, stories about any particular person is absurd," Howard said. "The fact that no other news organization has subsequently been able to validate the story after AMI released the subject from his exclusivity clause confirms the basis for our editorial decision."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 11:55 PM
 
26,582 posts, read 14,449,955 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultor View Post
April 12, 2018 (bold mine):

thanks.


altho there's still a piece missing. it's not jiving IMO to retread this in august if he was free to share the story in april.

this is interesting tho:

Quote:
"Paying for information has long been a practice of The National Enquirer and to suggest that it has only paid for, and not run, stories about any particular person is absurd," Howard said."

we now know that's absolutely what they did with the karen mcdougal story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top