Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The head guy at TMZ is Trump's friend. Today TMZ reports that the WH will attempt to get the Secret Service involved to out the source, using the excuse that the letter writer might assassinate Trump.
President Trump's administration's come up with a clever way to sniff out the source of that NY Times anonymous letter... Secret Service needs to investigate because that line could refer to a possible assassination plot.
Um, did you forget what your argument was that this is all made up? You're article just says they do not agree with what the person has done, and lots of people have said that.
But everyone seems to agree, the Op Ed and the message sentiment are legit.
Did you not see where I said that again in my post? You just quoted it. Maybe you didn't read it when you did.
The NYT either made it up, or they are willing participants in the subversion of the President's office of the USA. Your choice.
The head guy at TMZ is Trump's friend. Today TMZ reports that the WH will attempt to get the Secret Service involved to out the source, using the excuse that the letter writer might assassinate Trump.
President Trump's administration's come up with a clever way to sniff out the source of that NY Times anonymous letter... Secret Service needs to investigate because that line could refer to a possible assassination plot.
The head guy at TMZ is Trump's friend so they get WH insider info. Today TMZ reports that the WH will attempt to get the Secret Service involved to out the source. Using the excuse that the letter writer might assassinate Trump.
Likely others need to worry about an early demise. At least they are not dealing with the Clintons for most certainly those that go against them would sleep with the fishes.
Likely others need to worry about an early demise. At least they are not dealing with the Clintons for most certainly those that go against them would sleep with the fishes.
so, if the op/ed is legitimate, then publishing it is "participating in subversion". correct?
Do you know what Op/Ed means? They are working with a coward in the Trump Administration whose purpose is to destroy the Presidency. That's how the paper decided to handle it. So yes.
Either they take direct steps to stop it, or they are participants.
What's the national security purpose? Trump's feelings are hurt?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
