Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
so i guess you both think that if a woman makes an accusation against a man that is enough? sorry but it doesnt work that way darling little snowflakes. if she cant stand up to a cross examination, then she should never have made the accusation in the first place.
and by the way, if hill was so offended by thomas and his so called harassment, then she should not have followed him from job to job. he story, like dr fords, is suspect in so many ways its not even funny.
The Cross examination went well beyond the limits. She went where her career took her and left to teach, should she have left her career and let Thomas win. Go watch that hearing again and tell me it was fair.
The Cross examination went well beyond the limits. She went where her career took her and left to teach, should she have left her career and let Thomas win. Go watch that hearing again and tell me it was fair.
oh please, cross examination is designed to be tough on the witness, so stop being a snowflake. i have been through cross examination, and i confounded the defense lawyer to the point where he gave up on trying to discredit me.
as for where he career went, sorry but thomas was not the only judge round even back then. she could have found another judge to work for. she followed him around for what ever reason, which means she either decided to take what thomas dished out, or she lied through her teeth to congress.
Anita Hill wasn't brave. She sold out to the Democrats and found out how fine print on Faustian Bargains works.
The deal was, betray this man you have followed around for however many years, and in return, we will lavish favor/reward on you for doing dirty work we could not be seen doing. She was offered a deal and she took it. Nothing courageous or heroic about it. The problem is, she didn't read the fine print, which says "all promises are null and void if it becomes politically inconvenient to uphold any of them." So she did her part, and the Democrats reneged on her. They have a long history of promising much ad delivering little or nothing.
Anita Hill was a lying opportunist whose story had more holes than a stack of rat-bite-infested Swiss Cheese.
Shortcut - any time a woman speaks badly of a man she is a lying opportunist. Got it. Therefore, wimenz, don't you ever say nothin' bad about any man cuz nobody'll b'lieve ya.
Anita Hill wasn't brave. She sold out to the Democrats and found out how fine print on Faustian Bargains works.
The deal was, betray this man you have followed around for however many years, and in return, we will lavish favor/reward on you for doing dirty work we could not be seen doing. She was offered a deal and she took it. Nothing courageous or heroic about it. The problem is, she didn't read the fine print, which says "all promises are null and void if it becomes politically inconvenient to uphold any of them." So she did her part, and the Democrats reneged on her. They have a long history of promising much ad delivering little or nothing.
So what was it she was promised that was conveniently reneged on so there's no proof she did this for ulterior motives?
So what was it she was promised that was conveniently reneged on so there's no proof she did this for ulterior motives?
We aren't in a court of law, so I don't need proof to accuse people. Don't you know how things work now? I say Hill lied as part of a deal with the Democrats in power at the time, and they reneged on her, at least partially. My accusation is truth, now let them all prove their innocence.
She did it for ulterior motives. Accusation = guilty verdict. Done.
We aren't in a court of law, so I don't need proof to accuse people. Don't you know how things work now? I say Hill lied as part of a deal with the Democrats in power at the time, and they reneged on her, at least partially. My accusation is truth, now let them all prove their innocence.
She did it for ulterior motives. Accusation = guilty verdict. Done.
There is no indication that she did this for a reward, it was embarrassing to describe his behavior in great detail. She is one courageous woman.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
