Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Enjoying a beer is not the problem. Not knowing when to stop drinking and becoming belligerent is the problem.
If he was nominated for the SC in 1982 or 1985, he'd be deservedly rejected. Check your calendar. It should say 2018. There's zero indication he's been a belligerent drunk for 30+ years.
It's not about the beer. It IS about his harsh demeanor, belligerent temper and lying under oath to Senate committee.
And if those same allegations were said about you or a male family member - are you going to sit there and take it or defend yourself? My bet is on you defending your name or your family members and are you going to get mad, harsh belligerent - you bet you are because you are displaying that in your post with the emphatic IS.
It's not about the beer. It IS about his harsh demeanor, belligerent temper and lying under oath to Senate committee.
It is also about what some past behavior had gotten him involved in which is serious, having his character and judgment questioned. As said, in the process of questioning, his exhibiting an unpleasant demeanor and negative behavior likely proves he would be unfit for the position.
If he was nominated for the SC in 1982 or 1985, he'd be deservedly rejected. Check your calendar. It should say 2018. There's zero indication he's been a belligerent drunk for 30+ years.
None of us know what all he has done in his private life and his off-time, so we don't know what kinds of interactions have occurred with others. He does appear to have some issues, though.
This entire thing is so unbelievable! The leftists tried to get him on a weak, unsubstantiated accusation of a sex crime, and now that that is falling apart, they're saying he's unqualified because he got angry about being slandered and having his career destroyed.
This entire thing is so unbelievable! The leftists tried to get him on a weak, unsubstantiated accusation of a sex crime, and now that that is falling apart, they're saying he's unqualified because he got angry about being slandered and having his career destroyed.
You are mistaken.
The cover up is worse. He failed his job interview.
We have a drunk applying to become a SCOTUS Justice for life. He tried to coverup a simple problem.
He lied about his past.
What else did he lie about?
He failed his job interview.
There are others on that list from the Federalist Society, time to put a new name up.
He's not a drunk. He's had six - now going on seven - FBI investigations for high-clearance jobs, and that didn't come out. Are you saying that the FBI had six chances to discover he's a drunk and wasn't able to do it?
And this isn't just a regular job interview, even though leftists try to put it down as one.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
