Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I always lock the doors to my car and home to help prevent theft. If I left my doors unlocked I’m not asking to be robbed. However I am making it easier for thieves to rob me. Locking my doors also won’t prevent me from being robbed. One should take reasonable precautions to help prevent themselves from being a victim of a crime. Pointing out those reasonable precautions isn’t blaming the victim of the crime. It’s a lesson on steps one can take to help prevent the crime from taking place.
What is the analogy to women regarding locking doors? Is there something that simple we can do to prevent rape? If so, and you know what that simple thing is, your're a genius. No one else has been able to figure it out. Enlighten us.
Look, everyone knows women are more emotional than men, by a wide margin. Certainly there is enough overlap that generalizations aren't always true, but that doesn't make them wrong.
Women are overwhelmingly more interested in people. Men are overwhelmingly more interested in things. This is a scientific reality, not my opinion.
Men are tinkerers, women like to talk. Men are more concerned with principles, women are more concerned with outcomes. Men are builders, women are caretakers.
Women are far more bonded to their family and their children. Women, in defense of their children, will attack you with the ferocity of a lion. Men tend to be more rational and fair-minded. Men demand respect and order. Women demand acceptance.
There is a biological explanation for all of these tendencies. But I never proclaimed any of these things to be either inferior or superior.
I think in most of those cases they have all the proof needed, they just don't have a confirmed identity of the suspect, such as a DNA match.
If a woman is with the suspect, and they know each other, then I would assume confirmed identity is not an issue. If you know someone, then DNA is not always evidence. There's no nefarious reason why DNA wouldn't be present on both parties. Semen isn't always involved, you know.
Because in those scenarios it's harder to believe without doubt that it was against the accusers will and the accused knew so. And also the accuser's actions confused the issue of determining consent.
If a woman is with the suspect, and they know each other, then I would assume confirmed identity is not an issue. If you know someone, then DNA is not always evidence. There's no nefarious reason why DNA wouldn't be present on both parties. Semen isn't always involved, you know.
I was talking about the cases where the woman does not know the suspect. You're not keeping up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catgirl64
Again, why? I know you means I want to **** you?
Get real.
No but it can be more likely that the person wanted to, especially when they're are voluntarily alone together, drinking etc.
I don't think it would be preferable to females if males were like women and completely ignored or rejected almost all females all the time unless they are exceptionally attractive and of high status and approached the male first.
I was talking about the cases where the woman does not know the suspect. You're not keeping up.
No but it can be more likely that the person wanted to, especially when they're are voluntarily alone together, drinking etc.
Wow. #partoftheproblem
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.