Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They just needed a reason...this false flag did it. Can't have people expressing their free speech no matter WHAT they say good,bad or ugly,hateful or not...its not allowed! Gab was already under attack and this may shut them down for good...its the system trying to control ALL speech and confine it to social media they can control like FB,Twitter,Youtube...all alternates to those are going to be under attack.
Okay, so now we know Paypal is evil.
And retarded.
I guarantee you the shooter used Paypal as well. They better ban themselves.
They got kicked off Microsoft Hosting 3 months ago, because of the posts Patrick Little was posting as "hate speech"
Microsoft gave then ample time to swap host.
This company gave them 2 days....
The guy posted worse crap on Twitter. Twitter isn't getting kicked from their host?
Why do you think that Twitter is obligated to do exactly what Joyent is doing? This is an odd attitude to take toward two independent privately-owned businesses.
No, and this incident is illustrative. If boycotts by the powerful are permitted, it is impossible for competitors to exist. You're rooting for totalitarianism.
Joyent knew what they were getting, as Torba was getting booted from Microsoft hosting over some Patrick Little posts. Torba was clear it was a completely free speech social media platform. Joyent said OK. Now, the changed their mind and breaking the contract.
It’s legal to break a contract, if the proper procedures are followed. I’m surprised an independent consultant doesn’t know this.
Too bad outlets like Facebook aren't held to the same standards, when they host live-streaming of crimes, assaults, the kidnapping and torture of white men, etc. Twitter too, with it's anti-white hashtags abounding daily.
Requiring people to reregister with their real name and an email address held by their IP would not restrict the first amendment and would put an end to 90% of radical speech on the internet.
Says the guy posting anonymously.
Obviously, it would restrict the First Amendment. And we need more radical speech, not less.
I think it's funny how lefties tell people who don't like how they're censoring the mainstream social media platforms to go start their own platform so they can run it how they want. Then when they do that the left does whatever it can to get that platform shut down.
The Left hates free speech. There was a time when organizations like the ACLU would fight for the right of free speech, even for Nazis. Now they've chucked their principles and allied themselves with the SJW set.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
