Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But that's misleading. The mass shootings and bombings that have an element of intentional terrorism against the masses have overwhelmingly been conducted by angry, white men.
Las Vegas, 50-some dead? White man
Texas, 20-some dead in a church? White man
Newtown, 20-some kids dead? White man
Pittsburgh, 11 dead in a church? White man
South Carolina, several dead in a church.. White man
Stoneman Douglas, dozen or so dead.. White man
UC Santa Barbara, dozen or so dead.. White man
That's the relevant comparison, not one-off gang crime. I could go on and on.
These stats are tossed around by low information people who didn't study helpful concepts like "per capita" or "proportionality."
In terms of raw numbers, "white men" (or rather, right wing terrorism, which tends to be white men) have committed about 75% of designated terrorist acts since 9/11.
Islamic terrorists have committed the other 25%.
Sounds like white men are the problem, eh? Yeah, well... except that Muslims are like, 2% of the population... and "white men" are 35%-ish. So one is outsized by a factor of TEN, and another by just 2. So if you're going to concern yourself with your chances of any one random white man committing terrorist acts vs. any one random Muslim.... well... you should be smart enough to see who to take your chances with. And if you don't understand? Then kindly stay out of any discussion that deals with "statistics" until you learn what proportionality means. Don Lemon just made himself look a goddamned fool.
This is the same fallacy that leads people who are otherwise intelligent to believe that white men are disproportionately mass shooters (they aren't), and serial killers (nope). I think the one non-white collar crime "white men" are actually disproportionately represented in is possession of computer child porn. When it comes to the actual raping and pedophilia, however, they aren't over-represented.
Isn't that exactly what Lemon IS doing? Demonizing white men?
That is why it is so hilarious.
Quote:
Originally Posted by katharsis
When I read comments like this, it makes me think, for just a few seconds, that partial segregation might be the answer, and that states should be set aside in which only people of a certain color may reside. (For example, perhaps Iowa for white people, and perhaps Mississippi for black people.) The vast majority of states would be left to people who are not racists or bigots and who believe in, at the very least,tolerance.
Now Islamic Arabs are white again. They go from brown to white depending on politics. Banned from traveling here? They are brown. Kill people? They are white.
Hispanics too. They are poor oppressed brown immigrants. Unless they end up to not be Democrat. Then they become "white Hispanics".
Its a war. Its BEEN a war for 60 years....its a war I have no intention of losing. WHY anyone watches trash like CNN is beyond me. I can go read FB if I want to watch people whine about President Trump which is all CNN does.
Its a war. Its BEEN a war for 60 years....its a war I have no intention of losing. WHY anyone watches trash like CNN is beyond me. I can go read FB if I want to watch people whine about President Trump which is all CNN does.
Lemon: "There is no White Guy ban. So what do we do about that?"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.