LOL More sound and fury, signifying
nothing.
Apparently, the party of phony outrage--along with Newsweek and the NYT--know nothing about how elections work. Notwithstanding the fact that voters in any party/district, can't vote for a woman
if one isn't running, there's no requirement that House or Senate members
reflect population demographics--and in many districts, close to half of those represented don't even see their
political ideology reflected. So give me a break with the identity politics.
But, hey, it's good to know that, had Sarah Palin been at the top of the 2008 Republican ticket, Democrats would have voted for
her--
simply because she's a woman.
Right. See how that works?
Liberal clowns are so amusing!
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
