Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Where’s the link to the embassy’s denial that you claimed existed?
It's in Guardian story. "Sources in Ecuador, however, say Manafort was not logged." You can take that two ways, he was present and the visit notation was omitted, or no visit notation was made because the visit did not happen. Given that most of the story plays in London but the sources for the visit notation are in South America, it's not inconceivable something was lost in translation and/or distance.
Anyway, London and the UK have a shocking number of video cameras and certainly around the EQ embassy which was being guarded/watched/patrolled around the clock or Assange could have just slipped out. So, it would be easy for the UK to just pull up video or the Met Police to pull up their logs. A bit crazy for the Guardian not to try to confirm the visit that way.
Did you need someone to give you a link to the Guardian's "anonymous sources" story which you believed without question or thought?
GTFOH.
You know it's fake news. Manaford was never there.
In this post you claimed the Ecuadorian embassy had “gone on record” and stated that “he wasn’t there.” Do you have a link to support that claim or was it yet another lie?
You can't get into that Embassy secretly. Ecuador says he was never there.
Case closed.
So get some Hillary hot sauce. You will need it for whatever it is you are eating.
Orange Man Bad. Tomorrow the MSM will have you outraged over something else.
This pretty much sums up all of the people here suffering from TDS. I'm still in awe at how easily people can be herded like sheep. But then again, I can understand now why so many people vote for democrats because of all of the welfare they are promised, because it's obvious, they are just too stupid to take care of themselves and need the nanny government to do it for them.
In this post you claimed the Ecuadorian embassy had “gone on record” and stated that “he wasn’t there.” Do you have a link to support that claim or was it yet another lie?
It's in Guardian story. "Sources in Ecuador, however, say Manafort was not logged."
You are asking the poster/Ecuador to prove a negative. They reasonably denied it.
Did you need someone to give you a link to the Guardian's "anonymous sources" story which you believed without question or thought?
GTFOH.
You know it's fake news. Manaford was never there.
From the Guardian article:
"A separate internal document written by Ecuador’s Senain intelligence agency and seen by the Guardian lists “Paul Manaford [sic]” as one of several well-known guests. It also mentions “Russians”."
This won't be the first time the Guardian has been burned badly by making up lies about Assange.
There is NO proof that it ever happened.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
