Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As she is the breadwinner in her family, she can't resign from this job until she lands another one. Reportedly, she's interviewing, but no one will hire her.
This is not unusual for those leaving the Trump administration. Some get hired on Trump's 2020 campaign staff or at a Trump SuperPac, but few are landing jobs in the private sector.
Working in Trump administration is not a plus on a resume for even low-level staffers. Hard to imagine what political candidate or organization would find Huckabee-Sanders a positive addition to their operation.
The longer Sarah stays on for trump, no more difficult it will be for her to find another position elsewhere. If she stays on until trump loses in 2020, she is toast as far as making an income for her family.
Yes it is. He's a biased TeeVee pundit and the subject is an interview which he engineered. He's very much part of the conversation. And the only reason that you guys defend him now is because he's done something negative against the Trump Administration.
Maybe we should go back and look at comments made about him when he was slamming Hillary Clinton for her dishonesty on the Server Emails.
Sanders got caught in a lie. Doesn't matter who did it. She got caught lying and then continued to stand by the lie.
Has nothing to do with Clinton/e-mails. This isn't about that.
Do you dismiss Sanders lie?
Do you justify Sanders lying?
Is that what you want in The White House?
Not defending Wallace. Wallace could be a weasel but he caught Sanders lying.
He did.
She was lying. Misinformed. Her job is to have the information and she didn't -- AGAIN. She is accused constantly of lying and she goes on nation wide TV and lies.
What does the above nonsense have to do with the price of rice? C'mon, the thread is about the false statements propagandized as facts that stream from the WH and President Trump. In today's instance, Truth Trumped Sara. And it has nothing to do with who provided the truth but all about actual facts!
How dishonest do you want to be ?
The OP in post one has a photo showing who ? Chris Wallace, that's who, if he isn't a part of the story why use him front and center in the thread, post one ? Additionally its his interview that is the subject and his political perspective is as much a part of the thread as is yours or mine.
I get you want to be selective and limit everything to one side of the argument. That's what the media often does too and why so many stories are presented with the negative. They like the clickbait.
Because Wallace says something is a fact doesn't make it a fact. He is just another cog in the media wheel that thinks it has the right to choose who the President is and not the voter.
Do you support Sarah Sanders, even though she lies to the American people regularly?
I think that if the president is going to have a spokesperson to stand in front of us and lie, his campaign committee should pay the salary and we will understand that this is all political jibber-jabber.
There is no justification for having a public servant lie to the people who pay her salary. It is some kind of fraud.
I think that if the president is going to have a spokesperson to stand in front of us and lie, his campaign committee should pay the salary and we will understand that this is all political jibber-jabber.
There is no justification for having a public servant lie to the people who pay her salary. It is some kind of fraud.
I think that if the president is going to have a spokesperson to stand in front of us and lie, his campaign committee should pay the salary and we will understand that this is all political jibber-jabber.
There is no justification for having a public servant lie to the people who pay her salary. It is some kind of fraud.
Taxpayers pick up her $180,000/year salary + benefits for her to go on Fox News with her political jibber jabber.
Her press briefings have dropped from daily, to maybe once a month. Last time she didn't even take any questions, just introduced Trump.
Her salary should be picked up by his campaign as she is not even making the pretense of working for the American people.
Taxpayers pick up her $180,000/year salary + benefits for her to go on Fox News with her political jibber jabber.
Her press briefings have dropped from daily, to maybe once a month. Last time she didn't even take any questions, just introduced Trump.
Her salary should be picked up by his campaign as she is not even making the pretense of working for the American people.
Would all that nonsense also apply to Adam BullSchiff too ?
He has made 100's of appearances on CNN and other lying leftist media making claims he can't and never has backed up. .
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,368,826 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma
Would all that nonsense also apply to Adam BullSchiff too ?
He has made 100's of appearances on CNN and other lying leftist media making claims he can't and never has backed up. .
I'll simply note you haven't backed up your claim either. And your little hero in the White House continually makes claims like 'the military not having a pay increase in 10 years' supported by nothing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
