Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yep. That is why they needed the special counsel, to investigate the president. The investigation of him is now complete.
But here come the lying leftists, with more of their nakedly dishonest lies. What a bunch of maximum liars these people are.
Uh- the Mueller investigation was to investigate Russian interference AND Trump's interaction -
"The investigation was a United States law enforcement and counterintelligence investigation of the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. According to its authorizing document, which was signed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on May 17, 2017, the investigation included any possible links or coordination between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian government as well as "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation." The scope of the investigation reportedly includes potential obstruction of justice by Trump and others."
It's multi-faceted. In other words- if the Investigation concludes there is evidence of obstruction of justice, then the DoJ would report that to Congress, who is has the authority to oversee that item. There may be no need for any indictment on that.
I wouldn't go around crowing until the Fat Lady has sung. The curtain is still up on the show.
That was my next question. How many sealed indictments are there? I remember reading that they may be in the hundreds.
I have seen a couple of different articles that put the number of sealed indictments in D.C. District Court alone at 2-300. Mueller told Corsi he would be indicted for perjury, but that one has not dropped yet.
There is probably going to be a lot of backchannel discussion this weekend between Mueller, Barr, The House, The Senate, and the various satellite operations as to how to proceed. It could be that if any of the Trumps are included in those indictments, They will ask the New York prosecutors to file state level charges first.
Then again, maybe nothing at all will happen. What a time to be in the news business.
The case for Russia collusion … against the Democrats
If you want to visit the page in its entirety, (ads and all), just copy and paste the link and leave off the ?amp part at the urls end.
(The below link is meant for cell phones)
Quote:
Now that both the House and Senate investigative committees have cleared Donald Trump of Democrat-inspired allegations of Russian collusion, it is worth revisiting one anecdote that escaped significant attention during the hysteria but continues to have U.S. security implications.
ABC TV goes over the 5 indictment never mentioning that they were all not connected to the Russia investigation. Also never mentions that all the people doing the investigation were Democrats.
Even if they don’t find anything on Trump himself it doesn’t mean that he’s innocent. Same thing if it goes the other way his friends who have been indicted may feel that Trump needs to suffer as well, and have pulled him down with them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
