Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"Barr said"...? How about a reliable source for a change?
You mean like all those anonymous sources, that say...someone told someone who knew a few people that are or had worked for mueller, said they are mad? A reliable source like that?
First it was 'Mueller The Savior', 'Protect the Savior', 'Mueller Time'. Then Trump hires a new AG who's highly respected, has a good relationship with Mueller (Mueller used to work for Bar) and is a previous AG. The report comes out, but not to the liking of the liberals so it's all a cover-up!
Trust me, if Barr misrepresents the facts Mueller himself will testify so. He'll go in front of Congress for sure.
What's happening now is simply due diligence before releasing the report. Liberals are going way overboard and it WILL backfire.
Barr wrote a memo out of left field a few months ago criticizing the Mueller investigation for looking into obstruction of justice, then he claims there was no obstruction of justice based on the Mueller report. He also criticized the make up of Mueller's team and claimed a special prosecutor would better serve us by investigating the Uranium One deal. Does that sound like an independent and respected attorney.
He should have done screened the report period, there was no need for the Barr summary before releasing the report, he sounds political. What exactly was the point if his memo other than creating more confusion.
Tell me, what was the point in firing Sessions and hiring Barr.
I wonder how long all of our LWLT friends on here will keep (1) grasping as straws and (2) crying over spilled milk. 347 pages in this thread and not a one has been adult enough to just admit they were wrong, and that it's over.
As a casual observer, it looks to me like the Democrats are the ones riding a shooting star right now. The GOP has hitched its wagon to a president who is being covered over with legal problems and insanity. His absurd healthcare fight is going to put the nail in the republican coffin next year, since that is the primary issue America cares about.
I don't know about riding a shooting star, but it does appear that Democrats will come out of this debacle in better shape than the Republicans.
For one, the RNC's Deputy Finance Chair until just a short time ago is now facing a federal prison term and doing all he can to cooperate.
I wonder how long all of our LWLT friends on here will keep (1) grasping as straws and (2) crying over spilled milk. 347 pages in this thread and not a one has been adult enough to just admit they were wrong, and that it's over.
Barr wrote a memo out of left field a few months ago criticizing the Mueller investigation for looking into obstruction of justice, then he claims there was no obstruction of justice based on the Mueller report. He also criticized the make up of Mueller's team and claimed a special prosecutor would better serve us by investigating the Uranium One deal. Does that sound like an independent and respected attorney.
He should have done screened the report period, there was no need for the Barr summary before releasing the report, he sounds political. What exactly was the point if his memo other than creating more confusion.
Tell me, what was the point in firing Sessions and hiring Barr.
The point of firing Sessions and hiring Barr was to get an AG who would do what Sessions would not.
The longer Barr stalls, the worse this debacle gets.
The AP is simply and reliably reporting what Barr said. So the AP is credible in that regard. Now whether what Barr said is credible or not is the question.
Are you capable of seeing the difference between those two things?
lmao the NYT has been wrong for 2.5 years, but keep reading it, over and over and over. Where are the names of these people besides in your head?
According to the president? That makes them more credibility than him. Folks should learn the difference between OP-ED's vs actual news. The problem is that some people don't know the difference. I trust them more than the lying president. Since their subscription service is at a 13 year high, it's telling that your opinion is not fact. Time for Individual 1 supporters to realize, if the president is a proven liar and you believe the media is a liar, where is the truth? In your opinion? Yeah, In your head.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
