Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
you'd better watch out. he'll accuse you of "deadnaming" his friends.
liberals: "people are born gay."
also liberals "people are born genderless."
liberals: there are no differences between men and women
also liberals: transgenders absolutely feel "female" or "male" and MUST dress/have surgery to look exactly like those separate roles we told you don't exist
Liberals: we can't ban abortions because women just get them illegally
also liberal: ban all guns
San Antonio City Council just voted to ban Chick-Fil-A from their city airport, over their stance on the LBGTQ community.
They had better hope that Chick-Fil-A chooses not to sue and I expect they won't.
Again, while I do not agree with their stance a government entity can't punish you over who you donate to. (and that is why this happened not because of the stance.)
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 1 day ago)
35,583 posts, read 17,927,273 times
Reputation: 50620
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp
They had better hope that Chick-Fil-A chooses not to sue and I expect they won't.
Again, while I do not agree with their stance a government entity can't punish you over who you donate to. (and that is why this happened not because of the stance.)
Airports are kind of a unique market.
Cities DO choose which restaurants will go in their municipal airports - it's a limited space, so there are limited stores that can open.
It's a for-profit thing for both the restaurant and the airport entity.
It appears they have every right to say which restaurants will be offered a contract.
Cities DO choose which restaurants will go in their municipal airports - it's a limited space, so there are limited stores that can open.
It's a for-profit thing for both the restaurant and the airport entity.
It appears they have every right to say which restaurants will be offered a contract.
They could have simply turned the opportunity down. They didn't do that. They had to make it known that they turned them down because they donate to the Salvation Army.
Status:
"Let this year be over..."
(set 16 days ago)
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,220 posts, read 17,075,134 times
Reputation: 15536
Chick-fil-a is a privately owned company who donated to one of the most recognized charities in the world, the Salvation Army how dare them! These people need to get a life ..................
Aside from the politics, their food is unhealthy. That is reason enough to oppose Chik Fil A.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
