Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You've seen the report then? Could you share it with the rest of us, please, because no one who hasn't seen the report could make such a statement.
Here is the scenario that Comey mentioned that shows how laughable this thing is.
Quote:
the Iranians interfere in the election to help elect Barack Obama because they think they’ll get a better nuclear deal from him. And during that election an Obama aide meets with the Iranians and talks about the dirt they have that will help Obama get elected. And the FBI finds out about that. We should not investigate that?”
So after that Obama's hand picked AG (who got the job by declaring that the president cannot be indicted) writes a four page report on the 300 page document declaring that there is no evident that Obama colluded, but may have obstructed justice and is not exonerated.
Then Obama takes a victory lap saying no collusion that he is completely exonerated.
Here is the scenario that Comey mentioned that shows how laughable this thing is.
So after that Obama's hand picked AG (who got the job by declaring that the president cannot be indicted) writes a four page report on the 300 page document declaring that there is no evident that Obama colluded, but may have obstructed justice and is not exonerated.
Then Obama takes a victory lap saying no collusion that he is completely exonerated.
I'm sure the cons would be just fine with that!!
Yes, Comey is correct--just change the names and the GOP's entire reasoning would be tossed out the window.
I want to hear just one republican honestly claim that a Janet Reno 4-page letter would have sufficed in place of the Starr Report!
Newt would have been shouting from the rooftops--release the report, and not one Dem would say he should step down for wanting the truth.
And, btw, what ever happened to Trump defender and moon colonizer Newt Gingrich? Kind of went dark.
Yes, Comey is correct--just change the names and the GOP's entire reasoning would be tossed out the window.
I want to hear just one republican honestly claim that a Janet Reno 4-page letter would have sufficed in place of the Starr Report!
Newt would have been shouting from the rooftops--release the report, and not one Dem would say he should step down for wanting the truth.
And, btw, what ever happened to Trump defender and moon colonizer Newt Gingrich? Kind of went dark.
This
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
