Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-30-2019, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Virginia
1,743 posts, read 992,997 times
Reputation: 1768

Advertisements

As a veteran myself, I find this infuriating and want to know if President Trump has spoken on this?

I can't for the life of me understand ... what the #ell is wrong with these people?

You have this coming on the tail of despicable Tim Kaine (Virginia) introducing a bill on going after "White Supremacists!"

The majority of men (and women) who have fought and died for this country are now considered "White Supremacists" I guess?


Quote:
Several Congressional Democrats replaced flags honoring the American veterans with banners celebrating “transgender equality,” according to photos the Democrats shared on social media.

According to Fox News, the flags were delivered to every member of Congress by a group named “National Center for Transgender Equality” along with a request to fly the flags outside their offices.

It is unclear how many Democrats removed POW-MIA flags in favor of the transgender banners, but Washington Free Beacon found proof of at least one Democrat did so.

The POW-MIA flag is one of the most commonly flown alongside the American flag but is not seen in most of the photos Democrats shared of the transgender banners.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/democr...58522.html/amp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-30-2019, 04:18 PM
 
Location: NY
16,091 posts, read 6,863,630 times
Reputation: 12350
There is a time and a place for everything. Unfortunately some don't give a flying frock!


There are three types of people in this world.
1) male
2) female
3) bonkers
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2019, 05:37 PM
 
Location: Virginia
1,743 posts, read 992,997 times
Reputation: 1768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Retired View Post
There is a time and a place for everything. Unfortunately some don't give a flying frock!


There are three types of people in this world.
1) male
2) female
3) bonkers
Good One!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2019, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Maryland
7,814 posts, read 6,397,212 times
Reputation: 9975
Wait until they find out what their favorite pet minorities think of transgenders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2019, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,447 posts, read 4,757,118 times
Reputation: 15354
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiftymh View Post
Wait until they find out what their favorite pet minorities think of transgenders.
Minorities who are intolerant of transgendered people are intolerant because of ignorance. Their ignorance is a side effect of institutional racism. Therefore a black man's intolerance is a white man's moral failing. Or so the leftist will say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2019, 05:59 PM
 
Location: City-Data Forum
7,943 posts, read 6,071,729 times
Reputation: 1359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Retired View Post
There is a time and a place for everything. Unfortunately some don't give a flying frock!


There are three types of people in this world.
1) male
2) female
3) bonkers
According to science and genetics,

There are
1)male (Xy)
2)female (XX)
3)hermaphrodite (XX or Xy)
4) XXy, Xyy, X0, etc etc.

If only some would educate themselves. Instead, they talk out of their donkeys rear as if lies and self-delusions are the only things that would stop some from converting to their bisexual and/or homosexual natures.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...ex-and-gender/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2019, 04:07 AM
 
Location: NY
16,091 posts, read 6,863,630 times
Reputation: 12350
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuminousTruth View Post
According to science and genetics,

There are
1)male (Xy)
2)female (XX)
3)hermaphrodite (XX or Xy)
4) XXy, Xyy, X0, etc etc.

If only some would educate themselves. Instead, they talk out of their donkeys rear as if lies and self-delusions are the only things that would stop some from converting to their bisexual and/or homosexual natures.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...ex-and-gender/


Xy and XX propagate to keep humanity in existence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2019, 07:21 PM
 
Location: City-Data Forum
7,943 posts, read 6,071,729 times
Reputation: 1359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Retired View Post
Xy and XX propagate to keep humanity in existence.
Oh, so you are a humanitarian now? Ha!

So, propagation is your primary and vainly arbitrary concern? And you think that being nice to those who can't directly propagate with each other would be catastrophic to that aim? Perhaps you are worried of "conversion" of some of XX and Xy to one of their types then? Even the sex-chromosome genes are many more than just two. And a lot of sexual characteristic phenotypes (such as what sexual characteristics one is visually or auditorily attracted to) are in the other chromosomes (although sometimes the sex-chromosomes would work to active and inactive them).

But you also think that homosexuals, aneuploidies, bisexuals, hermaphrodites, and transversions don't propagate like the the more common sexual mutations? It seems that somehow, though, all the other natural ones also continue to exist, in existence. How weird if only Xy and XX should be recognized for the arbitrary reason that they can sexually propagate.

So what are you going to do about:

1) Xy who are infertile
2) XX who are infertile
3) Trisomy 21 who are infertile (except in maybe rare cases and/or with each other)
4) XXY who are fertile
5) X0 who are fertile
6) XXX who are fertile?
Etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2019, 07:52 PM
 
Location: NY
16,091 posts, read 6,863,630 times
Reputation: 12350
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuminousTruth View Post
Oh, so you are a humanitarian now? Ha!

So, propagation is your primary and vainly arbitrary concern? And you think that being nice to those who can't directly propagate with each other would be catastrophic to that aim? Perhaps you are worried of "conversion" of some of XX and Xy to one of their types then? Even the sex-chromosome genes are many more than just two. And a lot of sexual characteristic phenotypes (such as what sexual characteristics one is visually or auditorily attracted to) are in the other chromosomes (although sometimes the sex-chromosomes would work to active and inactive them).

But you also think that homosexuals, aneuploidies, bisexuals, hermaphrodites, and transversions don't propagate like the the more common sexual mutations? It seems that somehow, though, all the other natural ones also continue to exist, in existence. How weird if only Xy and XX should be recognized for the arbitrary reason that they can sexually propagate.

So what are you going to do about:

1) Xy who are infertile
2) XX who are infertile
3) Trisomy 21 who are infertile (except in maybe rare cases and/or with each other)
4) XXY who are fertile
5) X0 who are fertile
6) XXX who are fertile?
Etc.


Don't mess with meiosis
or else you will lose focus.
Time will tell as seeds are sowed.
This is just another bump in the road.
Natures mishaps leave many hi and dry
Unless a mad scientist wants to turn us all into fungi..........................

Last edited by Mr.Retired; 03-31-2019 at 08:04 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2019, 07:54 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 27 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,560,540 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogue Mahone View Post
Minorities who are intolerant of transgendered people are intolerant because of ignorance. Their ignorance is a side effect of institutional racism. Therefore a black man's intolerance is a white man's moral failing. Or so the leftist will say.
Im not really following your logic here.

You guys argue black people are more religious(and that being the good thing about black people), then when that gets called out when it involves homophobia and trans people, all of a sudden thats a leftist trait ????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top