Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-10-2019, 11:23 AM
 
8,502 posts, read 3,343,309 times
Reputation: 7030

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
Trump didn't mention the NWS either when he contradicted them the second time. He simply explained to the press why he mentioned AL. They are the ones that blew it all out of proportion and created confusion.

The poorly worded NOAA memo is on them imo. Already said they could have handled it better.

They could have said something like Pres was briefed on wind maps which showed a low probability of TSF winds for AL. He's not typically briefed on county by county forecasts; our local NWS in analyzing this data forecast no impact to AL. We immediately updated the pres and the citizens of AL. Sorry for any confusion blah blah.

Instead lol they blamed it on the Coast Guard and NWS and washed their hands of it...…...creating even more confusion and controversy.
The confusion starts when you have a President of the United States who doesn't consider it necessary to have anyone fact check his tweets - the information that he's sending out to millions of Americans. He was given briefings, had access to all sorts of expertise and still got it wrong. Authors hire fact checkers. Newspapers used to, not so much now. But not the POTUS.

 
Old 09-10-2019, 11:38 AM
 
16,345 posts, read 18,068,177 times
Reputation: 7879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
There's a world of difference between ineffective communication to explain your point and dishonesty.

I haven't rubber-stamped what he said/did.

For whatever reason, he thought there was a potential for impact in AL. We don't know why other than the wind probability maps provided to him said there was a potential. We have no info on how or if that was explained to him.

My current local forecast from NWS says there's a 10% chance of showers/thunderstorms for Friday. Yet, the crazy emo scientists at NWS now want me to believe they shouldn't tell people in AL when there's a 10% chance of Tropical Storm Force winds. Sorry, that does not compute. They cant have it both ways.
The NWS pretty much never officially forecasts anything with a 10% chance of occurrence. It's too low of a probability to be reliable, especially beyond a day or 2. Even same-day forecasts from the NWS won't include that. You continue to be wrong about everything.
 
Old 09-10-2019, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,334,415 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post
This is the beginning of the end for Trump.
More like the end of the beginning of the end.
 
Old 09-10-2019, 12:43 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,442,737 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbcmh81 View Post
The NWS pretty much never officially forecasts anything with a 10% chance of occurrence. It's too low of a probability to be reliable, especially beyond a day or 2. Even same-day forecasts from the NWS won't include that. You continue to be wrong about everything.
Sure they do. I just saw one yesterday. They even have a standard for reporting it. Usually, they report it in a forecast as a slight chance or isolated possibility.

NWS Forecasts - What Do They Mean?
 
Old 09-10-2019, 12:52 PM
 
16,345 posts, read 18,068,177 times
Reputation: 7879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
Sure they do. I just saw one yesterday. They even have a standard for reporting it. Usually, they report it in a forecast as a slight chance or isolated possibility.

NWS Forecasts - What Do They Mean?
Your link doesn't show what you think it does.
 
Old 09-10-2019, 01:01 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,442,737 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbcmh81 View Post
Your link doesn't show what you think it does.
It shows that they have standards for how they report probability of certain things happening.

But, there's no need for us to further debate it. We can just agree to disagree.

I'm sure now that we have the Chief Scientist investigating we will get a rational explanation

When the anti-Trump bias already demonstrated by that person prevents that from happening, the House Dems can open a Congressional investigation.
 
Old 09-10-2019, 01:07 PM
 
1,881 posts, read 1,010,918 times
Reputation: 1551
How many posts is blondy up to now on this? She must be the forum resident meteorologist wannabe that loves Trump
 
Old 09-10-2019, 01:29 PM
 
8,502 posts, read 3,343,309 times
Reputation: 7030
Just to be clear, the current point of dispute - I THINK? - is the accuracy of the tweet issued by the NWS on Sunday (Sept. 1) correcting Trump's earlier tweet about Alabama and hurricanes:

NWS TWEET: "Alabama will NOT see any impacts from #Dorian," the organization tweeted. "We repeat, no impacts from Hurricane #Dorian will be felt across Alabama. The system will remain too far east."

TRUMP TWEET: "In addition to Florida - South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama, will most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated. Looking like one of the largest hurricanes ever. Already category 5. BE CAREFUL! GOD BLESS EVERYONE!"
 
Old 09-10-2019, 06:37 PM
 
Location: north central Ohio
8,665 posts, read 5,849,040 times
Reputation: 5201
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
This is the best use of HIS time....and that sums it all up there.

He needs to retire -- -get on Fox or his own network and be done with it all.

His INSANITY is showing, you knows he is PO'D because he was ignored on all the news channels, for days and days, by hurricane Dorian,LOL,LOL,LOL!


25TH AMMENDMENT,25TH AMMENDMENT,25TH AMMENDMENT, what Freakin more does it take to prove THING IS
.... I-N-S-A-N-E?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top