Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I guess it needs to be spelled out in detail for some otherwise they wouldn’t have known it was piloted by hijackers, they haven’t read a paper in 18 years.
Every detail needs to be mentioned in order to avoid offending someone. If the planes were not mentioned, people like the OP would think the muslims flapped their arms and flew into the buildings by themselves.
Yes, folks. They used airplanes. Newsflash! They were muslims. Moooooooslems.
Every detail needs to be mentioned in order to avoid offending someone. If the planes were not mentioned, people like the OP would think the muslims flapped their arms and flew into the buildings by themselves.
Yes, folks. They used airplanes. Newsflash! They were muslims. Moooooooslems.
Does it translate to them "blaming the airplane"? Seriously? Spare us from the fake outrage, and have some respect. Everyone knows what they are talking about.
Any writer worthy of being called a writer knows the effectiveness of nuance and word substitution.
Though I doubt you'd find 'airplane' as a synonym for 'fundamental islamist' in any thesaurus.
It is an obvious attempt by the writer to use nuance to divert the blame from Islamic fundamentalists.
Another example of liberals feigning ignorance when confronted with their obvious lack of English language usage and nuance.
Obama admin was expert in relabeling issues to create or solve problems.
Does it translate to them "blaming the airplane"? Seriously? Spare us from the fake outrage, and have some respect. Everyone knows what they are talking about.
No we don't. You are wrong. Again, the lamestream blamestream fakestream mainstream crackhead idiots are downplaying Islamic terrorism and trying to sanitize the event and we won't stand for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber
If you don't know what happened, then why are you crying about the wording?
Since you do not know, maybe you should read the article and not just the headline, because the article explains terrorists hijacked the planed and flew them into the buildings.
Actually you dont have to read now that I have educated you on the matter.
You should write a book called "Right Wing Political Correctness for Dummies".
I do know what happened.
New York Times got called out for being liar crackheads again.
Airplanes didn't crash into buildings. Islamic terrorists did.
2000 people were not killed. Do the math.
Lying by omission = being a big fat liar crackhead. News at 11.
If you don't know what happened, then why are you crying about the wording?
Since you do not know, maybe you should read the article and not just the headline, because the article explains terrorists hijacked the planed and flew them into the buildings.
Actually you dont have to read now that I have educated you on the matter.
You should write a book called "Right Wing Political Correctness for Dummies".
Does it translate to them "blaming the airplane"? Seriously? Spare us from the fake outrage, and have some respect. Everyone knows what they are talking about.
So you are the AOC “someone did something” ilk.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
